2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

African wild dogs: Genetic viability of translocated populations across South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the success of the metapopulation in South Africa [ 36 ], multiple wild dogs were available as surplus individuals and packs. Considering this availability and their high levels of genetic diversity [ 78 ], wild dogs sourced from the metapopulation in South Africa were determined to be appropriate founders for the reintroduction. Across Africa, there are two main genetic clades that are distinguished for wild dogs referred to as the E genotype from eastern Africa and the S genotype from southern Africa [ 79 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the success of the metapopulation in South Africa [ 36 ], multiple wild dogs were available as surplus individuals and packs. Considering this availability and their high levels of genetic diversity [ 78 ], wild dogs sourced from the metapopulation in South Africa were determined to be appropriate founders for the reintroduction. Across Africa, there are two main genetic clades that are distinguished for wild dogs referred to as the E genotype from eastern Africa and the S genotype from southern Africa [ 79 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initiated phase one in 2018 which involved the translocation of nine adult males from the uMkhuze section of iSimangaliso Wetland Park in KwaZulu-Natal (-27.64026°, 32.15859°) and one adult and five yearling females from a free roaming pack in the Magudu area in KwaZulu-Natal (-27.50140°, 31.55088°). These male and female groups were unrelated [ 78 ] and were deemed ideal for artificial bonding to create a new pack in the pre-release enclosure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have examined the genetic diversity of APD in wild and managed populations in southern africa and east africa [7,8,[30][31][32]74,76], until now, only one other comprehensive molecular genetic analysis of APD in captivity has been conducted. Marsden et al [18] examined the same molecular markers (D-loop, DLA-DRB1, and microsatellites) as our study in the European captive APD population and compared them to wild and captive populations in South Africa.…”
Section: Comparison Of Mtdna Haplotypes With Managed European and With Wild Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inbreeding and genetic drift in these small and isolated wild populations has led to loss of allelic richness and heterozygosity over time [7]. Thus, these wild populations remain under threat, and ensuring their sustainability in the long term will require continued legal protection as well as a variety of conservation measures, including translocations and reintroductions [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the success of the metapopulation in South Africa [36], multiple wild dogs were available as surplus individuals and packs. Considering this availability and their high levels of genetic diversity [78], wild dogs sourced from the metapopulation in South Africa were determined to be appropriate founders for the reintroduction. Across Africa, there are two main genetic clades that are distinguished for wild dogs referred to as the E genotype from eastern Africa and the S genotype from southern Africa [79].…”
Section: Sourcing Of Founder Packsmentioning
confidence: 99%