Sound Symbolism 1995
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511751806.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

African ideophones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
74
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in Aslian languages, "expressives constitute a third major form-class comparable in magnitude to nouns and verbs" (Matisoff 2003: 50). Many grammatical descriptions characterise ideophones as an open class (Childs 1994a) and when specific numbers are mentioned, they often run into the thousands (Table 4). The precise numbers are less important than what they imply about grammatical significance and functional load.…”
Section: Typology: Ideophones As a Major Lexical Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Aslian languages, "expressives constitute a third major form-class comparable in magnitude to nouns and verbs" (Matisoff 2003: 50). Many grammatical descriptions characterise ideophones as an open class (Childs 1994a) and when specific numbers are mentioned, they often run into the thousands (Table 4). The precise numbers are less important than what they imply about grammatical significance and functional load.…”
Section: Typology: Ideophones As a Major Lexical Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…African languages and many others use a lot of ideophones, "marked words that depict sensory imagery" (Dingemanse 2012: 655 andcf. Dingemanse 2011;Childs 1994Childs , 2015Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz 2001;Dingemanse et al 2016). Japanese dictionaries list around 4.500 sound symbolic words (Imai & Kita 2014;Oszmiańska 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideophones have rarely been studied from areal or comparative perspectives, partly due to beliefs that they are unstable and have no clear etymologies (Childs 1994a;Blench 2010). One of the factors influencing the borrowability of linguistic items is the degree of system integration: this explains, for instance, why grammatical morphemes are less commonly borrowed than free-standing content words (Matras 2007;Enfield 2008).…”
Section: Implications For Ideophone Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%