2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

African Americans experience disproportionate neurodegenerative changes in the medulla and upper cervical spinal cord in early multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the future observational studies comparing outcomes across ethno-ancestries use 'Area Deprivation Index' (ADI), which can be derived from patient's address Another limitation is that we did not systematically collect data on diseasemodifying (DMT) and symptomatic therapies. In our prior work, we did not find differences in overall rates of DMT use across ethnic groups [27] and in a recent audit of NYU MS Center data, higher proportion of AA were receiving highefficacy therapies (natalizumab and anti-CD20 therapies) than Whites (data on file) likely in response to their higher disease severity. Thus, it is highly unlikely that observed differences in disease severity are due to under-treatment of minority populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose that the future observational studies comparing outcomes across ethno-ancestries use 'Area Deprivation Index' (ADI), which can be derived from patient's address Another limitation is that we did not systematically collect data on diseasemodifying (DMT) and symptomatic therapies. In our prior work, we did not find differences in overall rates of DMT use across ethnic groups [27] and in a recent audit of NYU MS Center data, higher proportion of AA were receiving highefficacy therapies (natalizumab and anti-CD20 therapies) than Whites (data on file) likely in response to their higher disease severity. Thus, it is highly unlikely that observed differences in disease severity are due to under-treatment of minority populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…African ancestry is a known risk factor for worse outcomes in MS. 21 , 22 African Americans have faster disease progression, 23 especially early in the disease, 24 and more brain, 25 , 26 spinal cord, 27 and optic nerve 28 atrophy. In line with these reports, we found that symptom scores were higher in AAs compared with Whites in every domain even after adjusting for age and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Furthermore, the natural history of disease in non-White people with MS (pMS) appears to differ from that of White pMS, with younger age at onset in Hispanic pMS [3][4][5] and more rapid progression of disease in pMS of African descent, as evidenced by higher lesion load and higher rates of brain and spinal cord atrophy in this population. [6][7][8] Hispanic pMS have also been shown to develop optic neuritis at higher rates and have lower normalized cortical volumes at time of diagnosis. 3,9,10 Structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH), which affect non-White populations disproportionately, are a central contributor to disparities in MS outcomes between non-White and White pMS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 MRI and optical coherence tomography studies suggest that AAwMS experience neurodegeneration and loss of brain and retinal tissue that is different from and more rapid than their White counterparts. [19][20][21][22][23] AAwMS experience atrophy of gray matter (−0.9%/year vs −0.5%/year; p = 0.02), white matter (−0.7%/year vs −0.3%/year; p = 0.04), and nuclear thalamic tissue (−1.5%/year vs −0.7%/year; p = 0.02) at rates twice that of White patients of similar age and disease duration. Atrophy rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (−1.1% vs −0.8%; p = 0.02) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (0.7%/year vs −0.4%/year; p = 0.01) were faster in African American patients.…”
Section: Disparities In Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%