“…These factions are often engaged in merciless struggles for access to power and to the wealth and material privileges which automatically reward the powerholders [Sklar, 1979;Hyden, 1983;Young, 1986;Staniland, 1986;Bienen, 1987;Bayart, 1986;Kennedy, 1988]. If African states appear to be strong, it is because their rulers often follow authoritarian modes of conduct to exercise control in a fluid political setup dominated by ethnic and interdistrict competition, factional struggles, personal rivalries, and complicated relations of affection and patronage that cannot be encompassed by class analysis [Hyden, 1986: 66;Ravenhill, 1986;Bienen, 1987:298-300;Kennedy, 1988: 76;Bayart, 1989:257-315;Herbst, 1990]. This apparent strength nevertheless conceals their structural fragility and lack of autonomy arising from their being 'generally uninsulated from the particularistic loyalties and 'role diffuseness' which prevail in African societies, perhaps precisely to the extent that they have not developed as civil societies' [Booth, 1987: 27].…”