Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkans 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5422-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afraid to Cry Wolf: Human Rights Activists’ Struggle of Transnational Accountability Efforts in the Balkans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A power politics approach attributed norm adoption to the assertion of power by the RECOM's leading NGOs (Rowen 2012, 705-708). Exploring the substance of debates, scholars drew attention to divisive inter-ethnic and intra-ethnic positions in this multi-ethnic network (Irvine and MacMahon 2013;Kostovicova 2010), the rejection of concepts, such as truth and reconciliation (Touquet and Vermeersch 2016, 65-68), and the discussions over definitions, such as that of a victim (Kurze and Vukusic 2013). Lastly, scholars revealed domestic opposition to inter-ethnic cross-border collaboration in justice-seeking (Kostovicova 2013;Di Lellio and McCunn 2013).…”
Section: The Recom Network In the Balkans: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power politics approach attributed norm adoption to the assertion of power by the RECOM's leading NGOs (Rowen 2012, 705-708). Exploring the substance of debates, scholars drew attention to divisive inter-ethnic and intra-ethnic positions in this multi-ethnic network (Irvine and MacMahon 2013;Kostovicova 2010), the rejection of concepts, such as truth and reconciliation (Touquet and Vermeersch 2016, 65-68), and the discussions over definitions, such as that of a victim (Kurze and Vukusic 2013). Lastly, scholars revealed domestic opposition to inter-ethnic cross-border collaboration in justice-seeking (Kostovicova 2013;Di Lellio and McCunn 2013).…”
Section: The Recom Network In the Balkans: The Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truth-telling ▪ Mutually exclusive public 'truths' about the past is often considered to be a key hindrance to reconciliation Bešić & Džuverović, 2020;Subotic, 2015;Kurze & Vukusic, 2013).…”
Section: Impacts Of Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Mechanisms And Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public 'truths' about the past in the Western Balkans are mutually exclusive and contradictory, influenced by nationalist discourses of political actors, with each side trying to impose its own version of the past as the legitimate one (Bešić & Džuverović, 2020;Subotic, 2015;Kurze & Vukusic, 2013). While this is considered to be a key hindrance to reconciliation, there is limited research on the impact of such contradictory narratives (Bešić & Džuverović, 2020).…”
Section: Truth-tellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While building on the strength of civil society activism and expertise in its multiple layers of addressing the injustice of the violent past, RECOM also must rely on state institutions in order to make its recommendations official and hence, truly meaningful and broadly transformative. RECOM has already been hampered by internal obstacles within the organizational structure of the broader human rights movement for which it is not equipped and should probably not supplant investigative prosecutorial efforts of the state (Kurze & Vukusic, 2013). At the same time, what the region needs is change in public remembrance practices, education policies, and enforcement of transitional justice mechanisms, all changes that need to come from state agencies in order to be implemented (Irvine & McMahon, 2013).…”
Section: Existing Efforts-recom and Textbook Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%