2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10267-007-0372-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFLP analysis for examining genetic differences in cultivated strains and their single-spore isolates and for confirming successful crosses in Agaricus blazei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many available DNA-based markers, AFLP markers are more reliable, yield a large number of markers per reaction, are cost-effective and have wide genome coverage (Prashanth et al, 2002;Hansen et al, 1999). AFLP markers have been successfully used, in the last decade, as a satisfactory alternative as well as compliment to morphological data in a variety of plant and tree species (Basha et al, 2007;Mahmud et al, 2007;Sreekumar et al, 2007). The purpose of the present study was to estimate the level of genetic diversity and to assess genetic relationships among 50 jackfruit accessions, collected from different parts of south India, using AFLP markers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many available DNA-based markers, AFLP markers are more reliable, yield a large number of markers per reaction, are cost-effective and have wide genome coverage (Prashanth et al, 2002;Hansen et al, 1999). AFLP markers have been successfully used, in the last decade, as a satisfactory alternative as well as compliment to morphological data in a variety of plant and tree species (Basha et al, 2007;Mahmud et al, 2007;Sreekumar et al, 2007). The purpose of the present study was to estimate the level of genetic diversity and to assess genetic relationships among 50 jackfruit accessions, collected from different parts of south India, using AFLP markers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of molecular markers would enrich our toolbox for studying the biology of this mushroom and developing genetic approaches. To date, marker techniques described on A. subrufescens are limited to random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Colauto et al ., ; Fukuda et al ., ; Neves et al ., ; Tomizawa et al ., ) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Mahmud et al ., ). These techniques generate anonymous and dominant markers and thus are in appropriate for some genetic applications (Allan & Max, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the expansion of A. subrufescens ‐related technologies appears to be limited (Largeteau et al ., ). First, few commercial cultivars are currently available and these showed high genetic homogeneity (Colauto et al ., ; Fukuda et al ., ; Mahmud et al ., ; Tomizawa et al ., ) raising the issue of crop health and the economic risks related to disease susceptibility of a monocrop. Secondly, although an extensive literature is available on its pharmacological interest (Firenzuoli et al ., ; Oliveira et al ., ; Wisitrassameewong et al ., ), studies on its ecology, reproductive biology, biodiversity and genetics are scarce (Kerrigan, ; Largeteau et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%