1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)92925-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity purification of the photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several investigators have used diltiazem as a tool to characterize the cGMPgated channel of rod photoreceptors (Koch and Kaupp, 1985;Stern, Kaupp, and MacLeish, 1986;Koch et al, 1987;Nicol, Schnetkamp, Saimi, Cragoe, and Bownds, 1987;Kaupp et al, 1989;Caretta et al, 1991 ;Hurwitz and Holcombe, 1991 ;Quandt et al, 1991), the mechanism by which/-c/s-diltiazem blocks the cGMP-gated channels of rods and cones remained unknown. The experiments presented here suggest that the rod and cone cGMP-gated channels each possess a single class of binding site for diltiazem, located on the cytoplasmic surface of the channel, and that the occupation of a single site is sufficient to block the channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several investigators have used diltiazem as a tool to characterize the cGMPgated channel of rod photoreceptors (Koch and Kaupp, 1985;Stern, Kaupp, and MacLeish, 1986;Koch et al, 1987;Nicol, Schnetkamp, Saimi, Cragoe, and Bownds, 1987;Kaupp et al, 1989;Caretta et al, 1991 ;Hurwitz and Holcombe, 1991 ;Quandt et al, 1991), the mechanism by which/-c/s-diltiazem blocks the cGMP-gated channels of rods and cones remained unknown. The experiments presented here suggest that the rod and cone cGMP-gated channels each possess a single class of binding site for diltiazem, located on the cytoplasmic surface of the channel, and that the occupation of a single site is sufficient to block the channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems possible, therefore, that the channel protein undergoes posttranslational or cotranslational modification in the native cell but not in the expression system, an interpretation that could account for differences between native and reconstituted cloned cng channels. Posttranslational modification could involve proteolysis, as suggested for cng channels from photoreceptors (Hurwitz and Holcombe, 1991;Molday, Molday, Dos&, Clark-Lewis, IUing, Cook, Eismann, and Kaupp, 1991), and it may also influence the affinity of the channel for cyclic nucleotides.…”
Section: Activation By Cyclic Nucleotidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This selectivity, together with the strong voltage sensitivity observed with all blockers, may indicate that inhibition by diltiazem is not "nonspecific" but that it involves interaction of the blocker with a binding site in the channel. Apparently, binding of diltiazem to the channel protein involves a distinct domain, different from the cGMP-binding domain, because after proteolytic treatment of cng channels purified from photoreceptors, sensitivity to l-cis-diltiazem was lost while activation by cGMP was sustained (Hurwitz and Holcombe, 1991). Interestingly, blockage of Ca channels by diltiazem has the inverse stereoselectivity, with d-cis-being eight times more potent than 1-cis-diltiazem (Reynolds and Snyder, 1988).…”
Section: Inhibition By Organic Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%