2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity membrane chromatography: relationship of dye-ligand type to surface polarity and their effect on lysozyme separation and purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, it was observed that the binding capacity was increased from 154.3 to 309.2 mg/g as the temperature increased from 277 to 323 K. An increase in temperature caused an increase in binding capacity. Similar results were also observed in the adsorption of lysozyme by other dyed membranes (27,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The increase in binding capacity of the membrane was related to the conformational changes of the lysozyme molecule.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…9, it was observed that the binding capacity was increased from 154.3 to 309.2 mg/g as the temperature increased from 277 to 323 K. An increase in temperature caused an increase in binding capacity. Similar results were also observed in the adsorption of lysozyme by other dyed membranes (27,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The increase in binding capacity of the membrane was related to the conformational changes of the lysozyme molecule.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To address this issue, we attempted to purify lysozyme using another method: ion exchange chromatography as was initially proposed by Strang (1984) and further modified by Luding et al (2011), Safarik et al (2007), Arica et al (2004) and Li & Chen (2002), just to name a few. The method is theoretically feasible to be used as a single step to purify EWL on the basis of isoelectric point (pI) of EWL is extremely higher (10.7) compared to that of other egg white proteins (< 6.5) (Anton et al, 2006;Machado et al, 2007;Luding et al, 2011).…”
Section: Purification Lysozymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the diluted solution was immersed in an ice bath and centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 30 minutes, the supernatant solution was filtered and stored at 0 8C prior to use as a lysozyme source. [42] The effective separation of lysozyme from the CEW on the MIP3 monolith is shown in Figure 9. A protein peak was seen in Figure 9, which flowed later than other existing proteins on the MIP3 monolith, according to the retention time of the standard lysozyme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%