Antibody Engineering
DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-666-5:389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity Measurement Using Surface Plasmon Resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the impact of higherorder oligomerization of MBL 3 failed to reveal any functional difference between the oligomers, with only an ∼2-fold difference in binding kinetics and equilibrium constants reported for human 33MBL 3 and 43MBL 3 (18). The standard model for analyzing molecular interactions by SPR is based on the assumption of a simple 1:1 first-order reaction (27,28), often referred to as a pseudo first-order reaction, because the level of complex formation between the molecules in the fluid phase (the analyte) and the surface-exposed ligands is regulated by the concentration of only one of the reactants (i.e., the analyte) (29). As demonstrated by Svitel et al (30), heterogeneity in ligand binding can be resolved into an ensemble of 1:1 pseudo first-order reactions with a continuous distribution of binding constants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the impact of higherorder oligomerization of MBL 3 failed to reveal any functional difference between the oligomers, with only an ∼2-fold difference in binding kinetics and equilibrium constants reported for human 33MBL 3 and 43MBL 3 (18). The standard model for analyzing molecular interactions by SPR is based on the assumption of a simple 1:1 first-order reaction (27,28), often referred to as a pseudo first-order reaction, because the level of complex formation between the molecules in the fluid phase (the analyte) and the surface-exposed ligands is regulated by the concentration of only one of the reactants (i.e., the analyte) (29). As demonstrated by Svitel et al (30), heterogeneity in ligand binding can be resolved into an ensemble of 1:1 pseudo first-order reactions with a continuous distribution of binding constants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the injections led to a steady-state equilibrium during the injection phase. The classic approach for evaluating the SPR sensorgrams expressing the binding of proteins to surface-immobilized ligands is based on the assumption that complexes form with a 1:1 stoichiometry in a simple pseudo first-order reaction (27,28). The binding kinetics of this reaction relate the signal at time point t, the rate of association (k a ), the rate of dissociation (k d ), and the constant protein concentration (c MBL3 ) in the flow stream during the injection phase as: where S Max is the SPR signal at binding saturation, and t 0 is the time point at the start of injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affinity constants of Fabs were assessed by surface plasmon resonance with the BIAcore 3000 instrument (Biacore AB, Uppsala, Sweden), according to the general procedure outlined by the manufacturer (8). The cysteine-rich domain of the Gal/GalNAc lectin heavy subunit, rLecA (11), kindly provided by W. A. Petri, Jr., University of Virginia, was immobilized onto a CM5 chip (Biacore) surface at a low density by amine coupling chemistry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common is that the binding event is based on a different mechanism from that which the selected model describes, which, in turn, is often due to insufficient assay development. The second is due to the existence of local minima where the optimizer may be trapped (Karlsson and Larsson, 2004).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of using reference subtracted data, global fitting of the kinetic constants and handling of diffusion-limited interactions were discussed in the early era of real-time biosensor experiments (Karlsson and Fält, 1997;Morton and Myszka, 1998;Myszka et al, 1998). Recent developments in experimental design include double referencing and the use of multiple spots (Karlsson and Larsson, 2004;Rich and Myszka, 2000). For applications where throughput is more important than precision (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%