2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity-Based Fluorescence Polarization Assay for High-Throughput Screening of Prolyl Hydroxylase 2 Inhibitors

Abstract: Prolyl hydroxylase domain 2 (PHD2) enzyme, a Fe II and 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) dependent oxygenase, mediates key physiological responses to hypoxia by modulating the levels of hypoxia inducible factor 1-α (HIF1α). PHD2 has been shown to have the therapeutic potentials for conditions including anemia and ischemic disease. Currently, many activity-based assays have been developed for identifying PHD2 inhibitors. Here we report an affinity-based fluorescence polarization method using FITC-labeled HIF1α (556−574) pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IC 50 values of FG-4592, AKB-6548, and 1 for inhibition of the PHD2/probe 12 interaction were 120.8 AE 3.8 nM, 215.1 AE 2.1 nM, and 21.5 AE 2.3 nM, respectively. These values are in accord with the IC 50 values determined by the HIF-1a peptide-based FP (FG-4592, 591.4 nM; AKB-6548, 608.7 nM; 1, 77.7 nM) 11 and SPE MS substrate turnover (FG-4592, 2.587 mM; 1, 0.276 mM) assays (Fig. 6).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IC 50 values of FG-4592, AKB-6548, and 1 for inhibition of the PHD2/probe 12 interaction were 120.8 AE 3.8 nM, 215.1 AE 2.1 nM, and 21.5 AE 2.3 nM, respectively. These values are in accord with the IC 50 values determined by the HIF-1a peptide-based FP (FG-4592, 591.4 nM; AKB-6548, 608.7 nM; 1, 77.7 nM) 11 and SPE MS substrate turnover (FG-4592, 2.587 mM; 1, 0.276 mM) assays (Fig. 6).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…We and others have reported various assays for measuring PHD catalysis, [7][8][9][10][11] including by monitoring 2OG consumption 7 and by monitoring substrate depletion/product formation by mass spectrometry (MS)/nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 8,9 or antibody based methods. 10 Whilst these assays can be useful for identifying potent PHD inhibitors, they do not provide information on binding constants, in particular to the biologically relevant PHD-Fe complexes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 35 hit compounds with diverse scaffolds were commercially purchased from Topscience (Co., Ltd, China). Their inhibitory activity toward PHD2 was evaluated in vitro using a fluorescence polarization assay developed by our group previously (Lei et al, ). All these compounds were preliminarily tested for PHD2 inhibitory activity at 20 μM, and full IC 50 values were evaluated for compounds showing an inhibitory rate more than 50% at the tested concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also measured the Z′ factor in both the traditional assay and the ELISA-like assay ( Figure S4b), which is a statistical benchmark to judge whether the response in a particular assay is large enough to warrant further attention. 30,31 The Z′ factors calculated for our ELISA-based FP assay are 0.84, 0.77, and 0.70 for α 1A -, α 1B -, and α 1D -AR proteins, respectively ( Figure S4Bb), and in the traditional FP assay, the Z′ factors are −0.49, −0.64, and −0.56, respectively ( Figure S4Ab). A Z′ factor greater than 0.5 means the assay is considered acceptable for a good HTS, while that less than 0 confirms there is too much overlap between the positive and negative controls for the assay to be used.…”
Section: Acs Medicinal Chemistry Lettersmentioning
confidence: 94%