2002
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2002.v9.n5.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinely infinitely divisible distributions and the embedding problem

Abstract: Abstract. Let A be a locally compact abelian group and let µ be a probability measure on A. A probability measure λ on A is an affine k-th root of µ if there exists a continuous automorphism ρ of A such that ρ k = I (the identity transformation) and λ * ρ(λ) * ρ 2 (λ) * · · · * ρ k−1 (λ) = µ, and µ is affinely infinitely divisible if it has affine k-th roots for all orders. Clearly every infinitely divisible probability measure is affinely infinitely divisible. In this paper we prove the converse for connected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we deduce the corollary stated in the Introduction and describe the connection with the work in [4].…”
Section: Consequences Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we deduce the corollary stated in the Introduction and describe the connection with the work in [4].…”
Section: Consequences Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of embeddability of infinitely divisible measures on the groups as above that are supported on A (and hence in N ) arose in the course of the work presented in [4]. Using the affirmative answer to the question the following result is obtained in [4] (strengthening the result in an earlier version of that paper); we recall here only a special case, as an illustration of application of Theorem 1.1, and refer the reader to [4] for other related results, including a stronger theorem for the case when A is a vector space, and a technical result in which G can be a general locally compact group.…”
Section: Consequences Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For any closed subset S of G we denote by P (S) the subspace of P (G) consisting of the probability measures whose support is contained in S. For a subset Λ of probability measures on G we denote by G(Λ) the smallest closed subgroup of G containing the supports of all λ ∈ Λ, and by Z(Λ) the centraliser of G(Λ) in G. For λ ∈ P (G), G({λ}) and Z({λ}) will be written as G(λ) and Z(λ) respectively. For λ ∈ P (G) we denote by N(λ) the normaliser of G(λ) in G. We recall that given a (convolution) root ρ of λ, there exists x ∈ N(λ) such that ρ ∈ P (xG(λ)); furthermore, if ρ n = λ then for every such x we have x n ∈ G(λ) (see, for instance, [11], Lemma 2.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weaker version of Theorem 1.1 stated above would not suffice where the original statement is used in [2], but it turns out that the proof of the result in [2] can be completed without recourse to Theorem 1.1 of [1]; see [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%