2018
DOI: 10.1090/tran/7464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine zigzag algebras and imaginary strata for KLR algebras

Abstract: KLR algebras of affine ADE types are known to be properly stratified if the characteristic of the ground field is greater than some explicit bound. Understanding the strata of this stratification reduces to semicuspidal cases, which split into real and imaginary subcases. Real semicuspidal strata are well-understood. We show that the smallest imaginary stratum is Morita equivalent to Huerfano-Khovanov's zigzag algebra tensored with a polynomial algebra in one variable. We introduce affine zigzag algebras and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result of Section 6 is Theorem 6.14, which gives a partial description of the algebra e δ d R dδ e δ d . A similar (but more explicit) result has independently been obtained by Kleshchev and Muth [22] for all KLR algebras of untwisted affine ADE types. More precisely, Theorem 6.14 can be deduced from [22,Theorem 5.9], which describes a 2 For any fixed i ∈ I ∅,1 , Kleshchev and Muth find a certain element of R de , denoted by σr + c in [21, (4.2.3)], such that the image of this element in R dδ multiplied by our Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗1) is equal to Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗sr).…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main result of Section 6 is Theorem 6.14, which gives a partial description of the algebra e δ d R dδ e δ d . A similar (but more explicit) result has independently been obtained by Kleshchev and Muth [22] for all KLR algebras of untwisted affine ADE types. More precisely, Theorem 6.14 can be deduced from [22,Theorem 5.9], which describes a 2 For any fixed i ∈ I ∅,1 , Kleshchev and Muth find a certain element of R de , denoted by σr + c in [21, (4.2.3)], such that the image of this element in R dδ multiplied by our Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗1) is equal to Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗sr).…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 78%
“…A similar (but more explicit) result has independently been obtained by Kleshchev and Muth [22] for all KLR algebras of untwisted affine ADE types. More precisely, Theorem 6.14 can be deduced from [22,Theorem 5.9], which describes a 2 For any fixed i ∈ I ∅,1 , Kleshchev and Muth find a certain element of R de , denoted by σr + c in [21, (4.2.3)], such that the image of this element in R dδ multiplied by our Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗1) is equal to Θ(e(i) ⊗d ⊗sr). certain idempotent truncation of e δ d R dδ e δ d as an affine zigzag algebra and is proved using explicit diagrammatic computations, which are generally avoided below.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In other cases, Theorem 6.11 seems to be new. In particular, as noted in the introduction, when F is a symmetric algebra, concentrated in even parity, A n (F ) is the affinized symmetric algebra considered by Kleshchev and Muth [KM,§3]. Under these additional assumptions, those authors prove that the elements given in Theorem 6.11 are a spanning set and then conjecture that they are a basis [KM,Conj.…”
Section: Proposition 62 Suppose C ∈ Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, z n ] Sn , but in the imaginary case B nδ is not so easy to understand. In the sequel paper [21], we reveal a connection between B nδ and affine zigzag algebras related to the 'finite zigzag algebras' of [11] of the underlying finite Lie type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%