2010
DOI: 10.1137/090771272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine Point Processes and Portfolio Credit Risk

Abstract: Abstract. This paper analyzes a family of multivariate point process models of correlated event timing whose arrival intensity is driven by an affine jump diffusion. The components of an affine point process are self-and cross-exciting and facilitate the description of complex event dependence structures. ODEs characterize the transform of an affine point process and the probability distribution of an integer-valued affine point process. The moments of an affine point process take a closed form. This guarantee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional concepts to describe the tail of a loss distribution are value‐at‐risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES); see, for example, McNeil and Frey (), Cotter and Dowd (), or Chavez‐Demoulin, Embrechts, and Sardy (). On the other hand, point process methods allow the dynamic behavior of (extreme) events to be captured and are typically applied in the context of portfolio credit risk, market microstructure analysis, contagion analysis, or jump‐diffusion models; see, for example, Engle and Russell (), Bauwens and Hautsch (), Errais, Giesecke, and Goldberg (), Bacry and Muzy (), or Aït‐Sahalia, Cacho‐Diaz, and Laeven (). Moreover, point process theory provides an elegant formulation for the characterization of the limiting distribution of extreme value distributions, see Pickands () or Smith (), and therefore builds a natural complementary framework to extreme value analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional concepts to describe the tail of a loss distribution are value‐at‐risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES); see, for example, McNeil and Frey (), Cotter and Dowd (), or Chavez‐Demoulin, Embrechts, and Sardy (). On the other hand, point process methods allow the dynamic behavior of (extreme) events to be captured and are typically applied in the context of portfolio credit risk, market microstructure analysis, contagion analysis, or jump‐diffusion models; see, for example, Engle and Russell (), Bauwens and Hautsch (), Errais, Giesecke, and Goldberg (), Bacry and Muzy (), or Aït‐Sahalia, Cacho‐Diaz, and Laeven (). Moreover, point process theory provides an elegant formulation for the characterization of the limiting distribution of extreme value distributions, see Pickands () or Smith (), and therefore builds a natural complementary framework to extreme value analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 where US news and market events lead successive market moves elsewhere around the world. Self-exciting models have recently been employed to model joint defaults in portfolios of credit derivatives (see Errais, Giesecke, and Goldberg, 2010). It takes some time for the transmission, if at all, to take place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his work, Adamopoulos [27], for example, attempts to derive the probability generating functional of the Hawkes process, but manages only to represent it implicitly, as a solution of an intractable functional equation. Errais et al [10], using the elegant theory of affine jump processes, show that the moments of Hawkes processes can be computed by solving a system of nonlinear ODEs. Once again, however, explicit formulas turn out to be unobtainable by analytic means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%