Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke

Sullivan, John T.; Hurley, Donna; Hedman, Lois Deming

doi:10.1177/0269215512442915

Cited by 26 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 58 publications

(107 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…666,728,729,[731][732][733] A variety of interventions have been the focus of ≥1 studies but have not yet been shown to be consistently beneficial for upper limb motor rehabilitation. These include somatosensory stimulation [734][735][736][737][738] and noninvasive brain stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation or tDCS) in combination with upper extremity exercise therapy, [739][740][741][742][743][744][745][746] interventions targeting motor apraxia, 458 and manual therapy approaches such as stretching, passive exercise, and mobilization, 748 although these approaches are a routine part of practice for individuals with more severely affected upper extremities to prevent contractures and to manage spasticity.…”

Section: Iib Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Winstein¹,

Stein²,

Arena

et al. 2016

Stroke

2,068

840

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

e98Purpose-The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. Methods-Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Results-Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness

show abstract

Section: Iib Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Winstein¹,

Stein²,

Arena

et al. 2016

Stroke

2,068

840

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies [12][13][14] have found mixed results with regard to SS specific changes in arm function. McDonnell et al 13 found no between-group differences in ARAT change after median nerve stimulation and TST.…”

Section: Functional Improvementsmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In chronic stroke survivors, improvements in pinch strength 8 , functional task performance 9 and motor training 10,11 have been observed after a single session. Several studies have examined the cumulative effect of SS and motor training in chronic stroke [12][13][14] . McDonnell et al 13 found small improvements in hand dexterity, which were not accompanied by changes in corticospinal excitability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study had a small sample size and a relatively short intervention (9 sessions) which may have limited the effect. Two studies trialled home-based SS with motor training 12,14 . Dos Santos-Fontes et al 12 found improvements in function only for the active stimulation group that appeared to persist for at least four months, whereas Sullivan et al 14 Our aim was to extend understanding of SS effectiveness in chronic stroke by combining stimulation of all three forearm nerves with task specific training (TST) [15][16][17] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies trialled home-based SS with motor training 12,14 . Dos Santos-Fontes et al 12 found improvements in function only for the active stimulation group that appeared to persist for at least four months, whereas Sullivan et al 14 Our aim was to extend understanding of SS effectiveness in chronic stroke by combining stimulation of all three forearm nerves with task specific training (TST) [15][16][17] . We hypothesised that active stimulation would yield greater improvements than sham for functional ability (Action Research Arm Test 18 ), impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale 19 ) and arm use (Motor Activity Log 20 ) with associated changes in corticospinal excitability (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Combined Somatosensory Stimulation and Task-Specific Training on Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke

Fleming

Sorinola

Roberts-Lewis

et al. 2014

Neurorehabil Neural Repair

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abdullahi,

Wong,

2024

Neurol Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Home-based rehabilitation is a cost-effective means of making services available for patients. The aim of this study is to determine the evidence in the literature on the effects of home-based neurostimulation in patients with stroke. Method We searched PubMED, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials on the subject matter using keywords such as stroke, electrical stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Information on participants’ characteristics and mean scores on the outcomes of interest were extracted. Risks of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using Cochrane Risks of bias tool and PEDro scale respectively. The data was analyzed using both narrative and quantitative syntheses. In the quantitative synthesis, meta-analysis was carried out using random effect model analysis. Result The results showed that, home-based neurostimulation is superior to the control at improving upper limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.32, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.65 to 0.14, p = 0.003) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) post intervention; and upper limb motor function (SMD = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.10 to 1.70, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.56 to -0.05, p = 0.02) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Conclusions Home-based neurostimulation can be used to improve upper and lower limb function after stroke.

show abstract

Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke

Cited by 26 publications

References 58 publications

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The Effect of Combined Somatosensory Stimulation and Task-Specific Training on Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke

Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About