Afferent renal innervation in anti-Thy1.1 nephritis in rats

Self Cite

We recently showed that a substance P (SP)–dependent sympatho-inhibitory mechanism via afferent renal nerves is impaired in mesangioproliferative nephritis. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that SP released from renal afferents inhibits the action potential (AP) production in their dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Cultured DRG neurons (Th11-L2) were investigated in current clamp mode to assess AP generation during both TRPV1 stimulation by protons (pH 6) and current injections with and without exposure to SP (0.5 µmol) or CGRP (0.5 µmol). Neurons were classified as tonic (sustained AP generation) or phasic (≤ 4 APs) upon current injection; voltage clamp experiments were performed for the investigation of TRPV1-mediated inward currents due to proton stimulation. Superfusion of renal neurons with protons and SP increased the number of action potentials in tonic neurons (9.6 ± 5 APs/10 s vs. 16.9 ± 6.1 APs/10 s, P < 0.05, mean ± SD, n = 7), while current injections with SP decreased it (15.2 ± 6 APs/600 ms vs. 10.2 ± 8 APs/600 ms, P < 0.05, mean ± SD, n = 29). Addition of SP significantly reduced acid-induced TRPV1-mediated currents in renal tonic neurons (− 518 ± 743 pA due to pH 6 superfusion vs. − 82 ± 50 pA due to pH 6 with SP superfusion). In conclusion, SP increased action potential production via a TRPV1-dependent mechanism in acid-sensitive renal neurons. On the other hand, current injection in the presence of SP led to decreased action potential production. Thus, the peptide SP modulates signaling pathways in renal neurons in an unexpected manner leading to both stimulation and inhibition of renal neuronal activity in different (e.g., acidic) environmental contexts.

“…The lower renal poles were exposed through a small flank incision. Rats were treated subcutaneously with a single dose of meloxicam (1 mg/kg) for periprocedural analgesia [51].…”

Section: Labelling Of Renal Afferent Neuronsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Labelling Of Renal Afferent Neuronsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Neuronal Cell Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Neuronal Cell Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Current Clamp Protocols-effects Of Sp and Cgrpmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Neurogenic substance P—influences on action potential production in afferent neurons of the kidney?

Rodionova

Hilgers

Linz

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Responsiveness of afferent renal nerve units in renovascular hypertension in rats

Rodionova

Hilgers

Rafii-Tabrizi

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Previous data suggest that renal afferent nerve activity is increased in hypertension exerting sympathoexcitatory effects. Hence, we wanted to test the hypothesis that in renovascular hypertension, the activity of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons with afferent projections from the kidneys is augmented depending on the degree of intrarenal inflammation. For comparison, a nonhypertensive model of mesangioproliferative nephritis was investigated. Renovascular hypertension (2-kidney, 1-clip [2K1C]) was induced by unilateral clipping of the left renal artery and mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (anti-Thy1.1) by IV injection of a 1.75-mg/kg BW OX-7 antibody. Neuronal labeling (dicarbocyanine dye [DiI]) in all rats allowed identification of renal afferent dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. A current clamp was used to characterize neurons as tonic (sustained action potential [AP] firing) or phasic (1–4 AP) upon stimulation by current injection. All kidneys were investigated using standard morphological techniques. DRG neurons exhibited less often tonic response if in vivo axonal input from clipped kidneys was received (30.4% vs. 61.2% control, p < 0.05). However, if the nerves to the left clipped kidneys were cut 7 days prior to investigation, the number of tonic renal neurons completely recovered to well above control levels. Interestingly, electrophysiological properties of neurons that had in vivo axons from the right non-clipped kidneys were not distinguishable from controls. Renal DRG neurons from nephritic rats also showed less often tonic activity upon current injection (43.4% vs. 64.8% control, p < 0.05). Putative sympathoexcitatory and impaired sympathoinhibitory renal afferent nerve fibers probably contribute to increased sympathetic activity in 2K1C hypertension.

Afferent neurons of the kidney with impaired firing pattern in inflammation – role of sodium currents?

Lale,

Ditting,

Hilgers

et al. 2023

Peripheral neurons with renal afferents exhibit a predominantly tonic firing pattern of higher frequency that is reduced to low frequencies (phasic firing pattern) in renal inflammation. We wanted to test the hypothesis that the reduction in firing activity during inflammation is due to high-activity tonic neurons switching from higher to low frequencies depending on altered sodium currents. We identified and cultivated afferent sensory neurons with renal projections from the dorsal root ganglia (Th11-L2). Cultivated neurons were incubated with the chemokine CXCL1 (1,5 nmol/ml) for 12 h. We characterized neurons as “tonic,” i.e., sustained action potential (AP) firing, or “phasic,” i.e., < 5 APs upon stimulation in the current clamp. Their membrane currents were investigated in a voltage clamp. Data analyzed: renal vs. non-renal and tonic vs. phasic neurons. Renal afferent neurons exposed to CXCL1 showed a decrease in tonic firing pattern (CXCL1: 35,6% vs. control: 57%, P < 0.05). Na+ and K+ currents were not different between control renal and non-renal DRG neurons. Phasic neurons exhibited higher Na+ and K+ currents than tonic resulting in shorter APs (3.7 ± 0.3 vs. 6.1 ± 0.6 ms, P < 0.01). In neurons incubated with CXCL1, Na+ and K+ peak current density increased in phasic (Na+: − 969 ± 47 vs. − 758 ± 47 nA/pF, P < 0.01; K+: 707 ± 22 vs. 558 ± 31 nA/pF, P < 0.01), but were unchanged in tonic neurons. Phasic neurons exposed to CXCL1 showed a broader range of Na+ currents ([− 365– − 1429 nA] vs. [− 412– − 4273 nA]; P < 0.05) similar to tonic neurons. After CXCL1 exposure, significant changes in phasic neurons were observed in sodium activation/inactivation as well as a wider distribution of Na+ currents characteristic of tonic neurons. These findings indicate a subgroup of tonic neurons besides mere tonic or phasic neurons exists able to exhibit a phasic activity pattern under pathological conditions.