Affective State Recognition and Adaptation in Human-Robot Interaction: A Design Approach

Liu, Changchun; Rani, P. Arockia Jansi; Sarkar, Nilanjan

doi:10.1109/iros.2006.282328

Cited by 16 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The primary advantage for using psychophysiological measurements is that participants cannot consciously manipulate the activities of their autonomic nervous system [15,17,18,20,26,28]. Also, psychophysiological measures offer a minimally-invasive method that are used to determine the stress levels and responses of participants interacting with technology [15,18,20,26,28].…”

Section: Methods Of Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multiple psychophysiological signals were measured which is highly recommended for this type of study for reliability and validity in the results [2,4,15,17,20,26,28]. As a result of having a larger participant pool than previous studies, they found statistically significant results and were able to discover the best psychophysiology measures to determine valence and arousal responses from participants.…”

Section: Survey Of Human Studies For Hrimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations

Bethel

Murphy

2010

Int J of Soc Robotics

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides an overview on planning, designing, and executing human studies for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) that leads to ten recommendations for experimental design and study execution. Two improvements are described, using insights from the psychology and social science disciplines. First is to use large sample sizes to better represent the populations being investigated to have a higher probability of obtaining statistically significant results. Second is the application of three or more methods of evaluation to have reliable and accurate results, and convergent validity. Five primary methods of evaluation exist: selfassessments, behavioral observations, psychophysiological measures, interviews, and task performance metrics. The article describes specific tools and procedures for operationalizing these improvements, as well as suggestions for recruiting participants. A recent large-scale, complex, controlled human study in HRI using 128 participants and four methods of evaluation is presented to illustrate planning, design, and execution choices.

show abstract

Section: Methods Of Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Survey Of Human Studies For Hrimentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations

Bethel

Murphy

2010

Int J of Soc Robotics

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…using the psychophysiological measures, is gaining more popularity in the HRI studies because, as mentioned above, it is a relatively fair approach. This is because participants cannot consciously manipulate the activities of their autonomic nervous system [5,7,71,92,99,103,128,130].…”

Section: Psycho-physiological Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Psycho-physiological measures offer a non-invasive method that can be used to determine the stress levels and reactions of participants interacting with the technology [5,71,99,103,128,130]. However, on the other hand, one of the weaknesses of using psycho-physiological measurements is that it can complicate the process because the results are not always straightforward and confounds can lead to misinterpretation of data.…”

Section: Psycho-physiological Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review

Sim

Loo

2015

Information Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tAssessment and evaluation methodologies as well as combinations of them, for modelling of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), are reviewed extensively and thoroughly in this paper. However, based on the types of robots and the kinds of interactions involved in the modelling of HRI, we concentrate just on the assistive social robot types. A comprehensive review has been done on each of these extensive evaluation and assessment methodologies applied for testing the usability of assistive social robots, user acceptance towards robots and robot acceptance in terms of behavioural adaptation during the HRI. The evaluation methodologies are reviewed based on the primary and non-primary basis, while the assessment methodologies are reviewed based on the type(s) of modelling approaches. We then discussed the weaknesses, strengths and uniqueness of each type of the past research work done on the evaluation and assessment methodologies. Comparison and contrast tables are also illustrated. Lastly, this paper provides our recommended directions, new vision, as well as our inspirations and new insights for future researches by highlighting the key areas for enhancing each of the past evaluation and assessment methodologies so that a better modelling approach for HRI can be achieved. Contributions of this review paper are also discussed thoroughly.

show abstract

“…Psychophysiological measures are useful evaluation tools for HRI studies if used appropriately. There is a tendency in the research community to attribute the results of psychophysiological measures to specific causes and/or emotions; however the readings may be attributed to multiple factors or confounds making it difficult to isolate the specific factors [7], [1], [8], [9], [5], [6]. Because the results are visible as tangible output, researchers have a tendency to make stronger assumptions than may be accurate [4].…”

Section: Review Of Psychophysiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies

Bethel

Burke

Murphy

et al. 2007

2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper outlines key experimental design issues associated with the use of psychophysiological measures in human-robot interaction (HRI) studies and summarizes related studies. Psychophysiological measurements are one tool for evaluating participants' reactions to a robot with which they are interacting. A brief review of psychophysiology is provided which includes: physiological activities and response tendencies; common psychophysiological measures; and advantages/issues related to psychophysiological measures. Psychophysiological experimental design recommendations are given for information required from participants before the psychophysiological measures are performed; a method to reduce habituation; post-testing assessment process; determining adequate sample sizes; and testing methods commonly used in HRI studies with recommended electrode placements. Psychophysiological measures should be utilized as part of a multi-faceted approach to experimental design including self-assessments, participant interviews, and/or video-recorded data collection methods over the course of an experimental study. Two or more methods of measurement should be utilized for convergent validity. Although psychophysiological measures may not be appropriate for all HRI studies, they can provide a valuable evaluation tool of participants' responses when properly incorporated into a multi-faceted experimental design.

show abstract

Affective State Recognition and Adaptation in Human-Robot Interaction: A Design Approach

Cited by 16 publications

References 16 publications

Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations

Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations

Extensive assessment and evaluation methodologies on assistive social robots for modelling human–robot interaction – A review

Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About