2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective responses to resistance exercise: Toward a consensus on the timing of assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the issues regarding timing and the number of assessment moments, six applications of the FS and FAS were performed, all after the last set of the RT exercises. The protocol implementation (both regarding training and application) seems to align with Andrade et al 8 suggestions of its contextual feasibility. No issues were detected during data collection nor did incoherent results appear for FS/FAS (no outliers or random scores).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To address the issues regarding timing and the number of assessment moments, six applications of the FS and FAS were performed, all after the last set of the RT exercises. The protocol implementation (both regarding training and application) seems to align with Andrade et al 8 suggestions of its contextual feasibility. No issues were detected during data collection nor did incoherent results appear for FS/FAS (no outliers or random scores).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The second and main session followed the same exercise structure but with three sets for each resistance training exercise. The FS and the FAS were applied after the termination of the warm‐up, immediately after the third set of each exercise, following Andrade et al 8 suggestions, and 5 min after the cool‐down. The RIR scale was used after every set to better adjust the load for the third and final set, with the objective of approaching concentric failure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations