2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40750-023-00224-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Responses to Natural and Technological Disasters; An Evolutionary Perspective

Abstract: Anecdotal reports indicate more severe psychological distress following technological catastrophes in comparison to natural disasters. Previous research also suggests a more negative evaluation of the outcomes of disasters if they are manmade. On the other hand, evolutionary neuroscience shows differential neural processing of ancient and modern threats. Building upon this literature, we probed valence and arousal ratings of stimuli depicting natural and technological disasters in several standardized affectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for the positive relationships observed between fear of environmental catastrophes and climate concern among liberals and moderates can be found within relevant disaster literature. A robust body of research suggests that anthropogenic environmental disasters are perceived as markedly more unpleasant (Shapouri et al, 2023), threatening (Rudski et al, 2011), and severe (Siegrist & Sütterlin, 2014) than natural disasters due to human causal involvement (Böhm & Pfister, 2000;Brun, 1992;Xie et al, 2010). These additional negative associations may uniquely increase climate risk perceptions (Lerner & Keltner, 2001;Sjöberg, 2007;Slovic & Peters, 2006) when compared to natural disasters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for the positive relationships observed between fear of environmental catastrophes and climate concern among liberals and moderates can be found within relevant disaster literature. A robust body of research suggests that anthropogenic environmental disasters are perceived as markedly more unpleasant (Shapouri et al, 2023), threatening (Rudski et al, 2011), and severe (Siegrist & Sütterlin, 2014) than natural disasters due to human causal involvement (Böhm & Pfister, 2000;Brun, 1992;Xie et al, 2010). These additional negative associations may uniquely increase climate risk perceptions (Lerner & Keltner, 2001;Sjöberg, 2007;Slovic & Peters, 2006) when compared to natural disasters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies compared the evaluation of ancestral and modern threats. Shapouri et al (2023) have recently demonstrated that the evolutionary age of disasters is one of the factors that affect emotional experiences evoked by these threats and can impact our evaluations of catastrophes. Technological (modern, manmade) disasters were rated as slightly less arousing but significantly more unpleasant than natural (ancient) disasters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%