Affective responses to body stimuli: comparing male and female bodies with cropped heads and masked faces

Abstract

Three studies were conducted in order to determine whether headless bodies evoke affective responses that might confound neuroimaging and electrophysiological findings. In Experiment 1, 224 participants used an online questionnaire to rate pictures, including bodies with cropped heads and masked faces, for disgust, fear, naturalness, valence and arousal. In Experiment 2, 38 participants completed a free word association task whilst viewing images that included bodies with cropped heads and masked faces. In Experiment 3, 57 participants completed a similar rating task to that disseminated in Experiment 1, whilst galvanic skin responses were measured. Results from all studies found no differences in the affective response elicited by bodies without heads versus bodies with masked faces. Female bodies were thought of more positively than male bodies, however. These findings suggest that headless body stimuli are not abhorrent in any way and are thus the preferable stimuli for investigating body-selective perceptual processes as they do not evoke face-processing mechanisms. Our findings also suggest that differences between male and female body viewing should be considered when investigating visual body perception.

Distinct neural response to visual perspective and body size in the extrastriate body area

“…The heads of all stimuli were excluded to ensure that the identity of each model was anonymous. Importantly, research has highlighted that headless bodies are suitable stimuli for investigating body-selective perceptual processing, without evoking faceprocessing mechanisms (Groves, Kennett, & Gillmeister, 2018). Each model was photographed from an egocentric (first-person) and allocentric (third-person) visual perspective (see Fig.…”