2008
DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective ratings of sound stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
40
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3 fits the typical boomerang shape found by Bradley and Lang in both the first (1999b) and the second (2007a) editions of the IADS, as well as by Redondo et al (2008) and Fernández-Abascal et al (2008) in the Spanish standardizations of the first edition of the IADS database. As is demonstrated by inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 fits the typical boomerang shape found by Bradley and Lang in both the first (1999b) and the second (2007a) editions of the IADS, as well as by Redondo et al (2008) and Fernández-Abascal et al (2008) in the Spanish standardizations of the first edition of the IADS database. As is demonstrated by inspection of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We then explore sex differences in these ratings. Finally, we present data on cross-cultural differences between the EP adaptation of the IADS and the American (Bradley & Lang, 2007a) and Spanish (Fernández-Abascal et al, 2008;Redondo et al, 2008) standardizations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various psychological and psychophysiological experiments have revealed that these stimuli sets have great potential in the investigation of sad, fear, and disgust emotion [43,50]. Additionally, Mikels et al (Mikels et al, 2005) and Redondo et al (Redondo et al, 2008) provided a more complete characterisation of the categorical structure of the IAPS and IADS stimuli set, with the objective of identifying images and sounds that elicit one discrete emotion more than other emotions. The IAPS pictures 1 [disgust: valence-mean ± SD = 2.43 ± 1.51, arousal mean ± SD = 5.90 ± 2.25; fear: valence mean ± SD = 3.80 ± 1.89, arousal mean ± SD = 5.85 ± 2.12; sadness: valence-mean ± SD = 2.74 ± 1.57, arousal mean ± SD = 5.00 ± 2.08] and IADS sound 2 [disgust: valence mean ± SD = 4.00 ± 1.72, arousal mean ± SD = 5.82 ± 1.93; fear: valence mean ± SD = 4.00 ± 1.72, arousal mean ± SD = 5.82 ± 1.93; sadness: valence Emotional state classification in PD 11 mean ± SD = 3.28 ± 1.65, arousal mean ± SD = 6.61 ± 1.89] were selected and combined together according to their arousal and valence values provided in the databases.…”
Section: Stimulus Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%