1990
DOI: 10.1177/074355489053004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Personality Characteristics Associated with Undergraduate Ego Identity Formation

Abstract: The characteristics involved in ego identity formation in the areas of occupation, religion and politics, and existing gender differences were examined using 144 undergraduates (59 males) and (85 females). The Dellas Identity Status Inventory-Occupation, -Religious Beliefs, and -Political Ideology (three objective scales) assessed identity statuses, and the Omnibus Personality Inventory (OPI) assessed personality characteristics. Different characteristics discriminated among the statuses in each area: impulse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This task is particularly complex since individuals have to enact significant choices in multiple domains: while some of them can assume relevant commitments in both ideological (e.g., vocation, religion, politics) and interpersonal (e.g., relationships with friends and partners) domains most youth may endorse salient commitments in one identity domain but not in another one (Bosma and Jackson 1990). In fact, as documented by empirical studies (Dellas and Jernigan 1990;Goossens 2001;Fadjukoff et al 2005;Pastorino et al 1997), there is low congruence in identity statuses across domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This task is particularly complex since individuals have to enact significant choices in multiple domains: while some of them can assume relevant commitments in both ideological (e.g., vocation, religion, politics) and interpersonal (e.g., relationships with friends and partners) domains most youth may endorse salient commitments in one identity domain but not in another one (Bosma and Jackson 1990). In fact, as documented by empirical studies (Dellas and Jernigan 1990;Goossens 2001;Fadjukoff et al 2005;Pastorino et al 1997), there is low congruence in identity statuses across domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Identity status literature also confirms the existence of a strong link between anxiety and identity. In fact, a series of studies has highlighted that individuals in the various Marcia's identity statuses differed in anxiety levels (Adams et al 1985;Dellas and Jernigan 1990;Marcia 1967;Marcia and Friedman 1970;Oshman and Manosevitz 1974;Rotheram-Borus 1989;Schenkel and Marcia 1972). Therefore, it is worth considering which identity statuses are characterized by low anxiety and which, in contrast, are characterized by high anxiety.…”
Section: Anxiety and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it was speculated in the present study that should survivors of (acquaintance) rape have lower levels of ego-identity achievement (McEwan et al, 2002), and should ego-identity in turn be linked to locus of control (Adams & Shea, 1979;Dellas & Jernigan, 1990;Troy, 1996), then women who were raped by a person they knew should report greater external locus of control compared to women who were not assaulted. This relationship between acquaintance rape and external locus of control would be mediated by low egoidentity achievement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The difference in personal control referred to by Erikson very much resembles Rotter's (1975) internal-external locus of control construct, which deals with one's belief about the degree of control one has over the events of one's life and one's ability to cope with them. Indeed, Adams and Shea (1979), Dellas and Jernigan (1990), and Troy (1996) found an association between a strong personal identity and internal locus of control (the belief that one is in control of one's life as opposed to the expectation that luck, chance, or powerful others control what happens).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%