2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40806-016-0041-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Modification of the Startle Eyeblink Response During Sexual and Emotional Infidelity Scripts

Abstract: The sex difference in jealousy has been demonstrated to occur in response to actual experiences with infidelity, continuous measures of jealousy, as well as cross-culturally. However, to date, the evidence for physiological correlates of jealousy has been limited and mixed. As such, the purpose of this study was to explore the sex difference in jealousy using multiple physiological measures of jealousy. In our study, we demonstrate that the sex difference in jealousy occurs using self-report measures of jealou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent findings suggest that the same sex difference in response to sexual and emotional infidelity exists in the case of online infidelity (25,26). Furthermore, men (compared to women) were found to be more reactive to the sexual components of infidelity, as assessed by a startle eyeblink response (27). In addition, sex differences were confirmed in a meta-analytic review (28) that included 40 published and unpublished papers with 209 effect sizes from 47 independent samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recent findings suggest that the same sex difference in response to sexual and emotional infidelity exists in the case of online infidelity (25,26). Furthermore, men (compared to women) were found to be more reactive to the sexual components of infidelity, as assessed by a startle eyeblink response (27). In addition, sex differences were confirmed in a meta-analytic review (28) that included 40 published and unpublished papers with 209 effect sizes from 47 independent samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(g* is an effect size measure comparable to Cohen's d.) Similarly, in studies looking at people's physiological reactions to thoughts of a partner's sexual vs. emotional infidelity, including changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and corrugator brow contraction, the sex differences tend to be much more modest than those derived from the standard forced-choice items (see, e.g., Baschnagel & Edlund, 2016;Buss et al, 1992).…”
Section: Stacking the Deckmentioning
confidence: 99%