Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3404835.3463061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Dependency Graph for Sarcasm Detection

Abstract: Detecting sarcastic expressions could promote the understanding of natural language in social media. In this paper, we revisit sarcasm detection from a novel perspective, so as to account for the longrange literal sentiment inconsistencies. More concretely, we explore a novel scenario of constructing an affective graph and a dependency graph for each sentence based on the affective information retrieved from external affective commonsense knowledge and the syntactical information of the sentence. Based on it, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As attention mechanism has led to improvements in various NLP tasks, Tay et al (2018); Xiong et al (2019) use attention to capture the relationship of word pairs along with an LSTM to model the entire sentence. Lou et al (2021) design a GCN-based model combining SenticNet (Cambria et al, 2020), dependency tree and LSTM with GCN (Kipf and Welling, 2017) together, which achieves promising performance. Similar to previous studies, to better understand sarcasm, many approaches are able to utilize external information such as emoji expressions (Felbo et al, 2017), affective knowledge (Babanejad et al, 2020) and commonsense (Li et al, 2021).…”
Section: Neural Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As attention mechanism has led to improvements in various NLP tasks, Tay et al (2018); Xiong et al (2019) use attention to capture the relationship of word pairs along with an LSTM to model the entire sentence. Lou et al (2021) design a GCN-based model combining SenticNet (Cambria et al, 2020), dependency tree and LSTM with GCN (Kipf and Welling, 2017) together, which achieves promising performance. Similar to previous studies, to better understand sarcasm, many approaches are able to utilize external information such as emoji expressions (Felbo et al, 2017), affective knowledge (Babanejad et al, 2020) and commonsense (Li et al, 2021).…”
Section: Neural Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADGCN (Lou et al, 2021) is a GCN-based method with sentic graph and dependency graph 7 . The initial input of GCN is the hidden state of Bi-LSTM.…”
Section: Cnn-lstm-dnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sarcasm detection had been implemented by taking the contextual information of a sentence into account in a sequential manner using the concept of pseudo-labeling (Kumar Jena et al, 2020), (Kalaivani and Thenmozhi, 2020). Long-range literal sentiment inconsistencies had been taken into account in sarcasm detection by constructing an affective graph and a dependency graph for each sentence and had then used an Affective Dependency Graph Convolutional Network (ADGCN) framework for the classification process (Lou et al, 2021). Statistical approach had been proposed for sarcasm detection by combining TF-IDF features with the important features related to sentiments and punctuations that are identified using chi-square test (Gupta et al, 2020 such case had been implemented using a multimodal framework using Coupled-Attention Networks (CANs) which captures and integrates information from both text and image for the classification task (Zhao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we explore a novel solution to assign weights to the edges of the cross-modal graph by means of computing the word similarities between the object descriptors of the attribute-object pairs and textual words based on the WordNet (Miller, 1992). Further, to introduce the multi-modal sentiment relations into the cross-modal graphs, inspired by (Lou et al, 2021), we devise a modulat-ing factor of sentiment relation for each edge by retrieving the affective weights of attribute descriptors (usually adjectives with affective information) and textual words from external affective knowledge (SenticNet (Cambria et al, 2020)). As such, the modulating factors can be adopted to refine the edge weights of word similarities, allowing the capture of sentiment incongruities of the cross-modal nodes in the graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%