2006
DOI: 10.1080/13688790600824997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect in the civil service: a study of a modern state-system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We pay close attention to the working methods and ethos of actors (social movement activists, NGOs, civil servants, diplomats, delegates, technocrats, experts, legal practitioners) enmeshed in the everyday bureaucratic practices set in motion by these complex mechanisms. Drawing inspiration from the anthropological literature on the affective life of the state which emphasises the multiple and contingent emotions officials maintain toward the administrations they are supposed to represent (Navaro‐Yashin , , ; Laszczkowski and Reeves ; Aretxaga ), we examine how actors both reproduce and subvert efforts of rationalisation in their everyday bureaucratic routines. By exploring the affective life of bureaucracies, we seek to understand how actors maintain a sense of purpose and agency in spite of the tedious and burdensome nature of the administrative procedures in which they take part.…”
Section: Affective Bureaucraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We pay close attention to the working methods and ethos of actors (social movement activists, NGOs, civil servants, diplomats, delegates, technocrats, experts, legal practitioners) enmeshed in the everyday bureaucratic practices set in motion by these complex mechanisms. Drawing inspiration from the anthropological literature on the affective life of the state which emphasises the multiple and contingent emotions officials maintain toward the administrations they are supposed to represent (Navaro‐Yashin , , ; Laszczkowski and Reeves ; Aretxaga ), we examine how actors both reproduce and subvert efforts of rationalisation in their everyday bureaucratic routines. By exploring the affective life of bureaucracies, we seek to understand how actors maintain a sense of purpose and agency in spite of the tedious and burdensome nature of the administrative procedures in which they take part.…”
Section: Affective Bureaucraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of Emma's tears as she filled out her application reveals that bureaucratic processes have deeply felt consequences that need consideration. As a first principle, bureaucracies are “emotive domains,” wherein documents are “capable of carrying, containing, or inciting affective energies when & put to use in specific webs of social relation” (Navaro‐Yashin , 282; , 81; see also Herzfeld ). Bureaucratic processes and documents also elicit emotional responses related to civic inclusion because those in power determine rights claims and membership by defining, accounting for, and legitimizing modes of personhood (Coutin ; Leshkowich ; Reeves ).…”
Section: Documenting Membership: Bureaucracies Of Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navaro‐Yashin makes it clear that she is referring specifically to western European statecraft, or, alternatively, to “the Euro‐American paradigm” (2007:84). Other important work on state documentary practices includes Clanchy 1979; Goody 1986; Messick 1993; and Navaro‐Yashin 2002, 2006.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%