2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00513.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect consciousness or mentalization? A comparison of two concepts with regard to affect development and affect regulation

Abstract: Affect consciousness refers to the ability to adequately perceive, reflect upon and express affect. The concept is used in clinical work with adults, but lacks an equivalent for children's experience of affect. This paper examines the developmental prerequisites for affect consciousness, as well as the concept's applicability to work with children. The main focus is on the development of affect regulation throughout the first 6 years of life. Special emphasis is put on the role of attachment and the unfolding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be enough to ask for three or four different affects to capture the general ability to be conscious about affects. It also seems to support the mentalization model, where affects are seen as more exchangeable, over the theoretical model behind the concept of affect consciousness that implies that different emotions are independent but still interacting (Mohaupt et al ., 2006). However, the factor analysis presented in this study was based on summary scores (e.g., higher order factor analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It might be enough to ask for three or four different affects to capture the general ability to be conscious about affects. It also seems to support the mentalization model, where affects are seen as more exchangeable, over the theoretical model behind the concept of affect consciousness that implies that different emotions are independent but still interacting (Mohaupt et al ., 2006). However, the factor analysis presented in this study was based on summary scores (e.g., higher order factor analysis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Moreover, they contended that the theoretical model behind the concept of affect consciousness implies that different emotions are independent but still interacting. This is in contrast to the mentalization model, where affects are seen as more exchangeable (Mohaupt et al, 2006). They also maintained that affect consciousness implies a stronger relation to cognition, whereas the concept of mentalization implies that affects are basically beyond cognitive apprehension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relationship between the concepts of mentalization and affect consciousness (Monsen et al, 1996) has been theoreticcally outlined by Mohaupt, Holgersen, Binder and Nielsen (2006) and Choi-Kain and Gunderson (2008). The latter authors suggest that the concepts of affect consciousness and mentalization partly overlap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%