The Wiley‐Blackwell Companion to Cultural Geography 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118384466.ch37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect and Emotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider Thrift's (2008) work on nonrepresentational theory which has alerted us to ''the ways in which the preconscious, subconscious or nonconscious playing out of life defies easy description and representation" (Xiao et al, 2012, p. 373). We use the example of affect and emotion (Anderson, 2013;Harrison & Anderson, 2012) to illustrate what kind of things may be missed because of the power of journals to bound research. For example Buckley (2012, p. 965), when analysing rush and flow in adventure tourism noted that there is ''an unexplored theme, that of the indescribable or ineffable experience known only to active participants .…”
Section: Representations Of Tourism Knowledge (Circle 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider Thrift's (2008) work on nonrepresentational theory which has alerted us to ''the ways in which the preconscious, subconscious or nonconscious playing out of life defies easy description and representation" (Xiao et al, 2012, p. 373). We use the example of affect and emotion (Anderson, 2013;Harrison & Anderson, 2012) to illustrate what kind of things may be missed because of the power of journals to bound research. For example Buckley (2012, p. 965), when analysing rush and flow in adventure tourism noted that there is ''an unexplored theme, that of the indescribable or ineffable experience known only to active participants .…”
Section: Representations Of Tourism Knowledge (Circle 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The model demonstrates a number of generic features of systems, which consists of interacting parts and complex, dynamic relations (Anderson, 2013). It identifies a set of elements that form a meaningful and coherent whole in relation to the epistemology and ontology of tourism and maps the relationships between these elements.…”
Section: Extending Indisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; McCormack ; Wylie ), as well as by others (Anderson ; Laurier and Philo ; Tolia‐Kelly ; Lorimer ), there is now an expanded community (Lorimer ) of scholars across different fields interested in non‐representational theories (see Cadman and Vannini for an overview), as my examples present in relation to the studies of rurality and ageing. Indeed, as Anderson () has outlined, there can be no engagement with non‐representational theories separate from specific geographies. Through multiple calls and empirical engagements, the contention has been that non‐representational theories can enliven and in turn be enlivened through the expanded sub‐disciplinary perspectives brought to engage with this mode of enquiry.…”
Section: Non‐representational Theories and Rural Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engagements with non‐representational theories, affect and emotion have contributed to the understanding of a ‘wonderfully diverse range of geographies’ (Anderson , p.454–55). These include engagements as varied as to how the enactment of geopolitical intervention can be understood through the ‘tactics and techniques of film‐making that foreground affective layers of thinking’ in contemporary cinema beyond a focus solely on the discursive practices of codes and scripts (Carter and McCormack , pp.…”
Section: Non‐representational Theories and Rural Ageingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This special section also provides a framework for understanding the role of emotions in fieldwork. As geographers of emotion and scholars of affect debate how to theorise emotions (for a notable exception, see Anderson ), we suggest that the life course can contextualise these analyses within embodied everyday work and broader social relations (also see Wimark ). While the field can be imagined as a place free from social relations ‘back home’, they nevertheless travel with the researcher into the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%