2018
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s160358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afatinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin for first-line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring <em>EGFR </em>mutations: subgroup analysis of the LUX-Lung 6 trial

Abstract: IntroductionNon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China. Four epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors – afatinib, erlotinib, icotinib, and gefitinib – are available for first-line treatment of NSCLC in China; however, there are few data to guide treatment choice. The Phase III LUX-Lung 6 trial compared afatinib with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of patients from Southeast Asia with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Similar findings were reported in a sub-analysis of 83 Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 353 and in a sub-analysis of 327 patients from mainland China enrolled in the LUX-Lung 6 study (Table 1). 54 In LUX-Lung 7, there was no significant difference in OS between afatinib and gefitinib in patients with del19 mutations (Table 1; Figure 3C).
Figure 3Subgroup analyses of overall survival in ( A ) in LUX-Lung 3 (del19 and L858R mutations only).
…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy In Egfr Mutation-positive Advanced Nsclc Pmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 Similar findings were reported in a sub-analysis of 83 Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 353 and in a sub-analysis of 327 patients from mainland China enrolled in the LUX-Lung 6 study (Table 1). 54 In LUX-Lung 7, there was no significant difference in OS between afatinib and gefitinib in patients with del19 mutations (Table 1; Figure 3C).
Figure 3Subgroup analyses of overall survival in ( A ) in LUX-Lung 3 (del19 and L858R mutations only).
…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy In Egfr Mutation-positive Advanced Nsclc Pmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In 24 patients with G719X, S768I, or L861Q mutations, median PFS was 18.3 months with afatinib and 2.6 months for both erlotinib and gefitinib. Subsequent to these reports, and on the basis of the results from the LUX-Lung 2, 3, and 6 trials, the United States FDA approval for afatinib was extended to include patients with these mutations 54…”
Section: First-line Clinical Efficacy In Patient Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies indicate that afatinib is effective in specific Asian populations. In a Chinese subanalysis of LUX-Lung 6, median PFS with afatinib was 11.0 months and median OS was 23.6 months (Table 1) [45]. PFS benefit over chemo was significant both in patients with Del19 (HR: 0.21) and L858R mutations (HR: 0.33).…”
Section: Second-generation Egfr Tkis (Erbb Family Blockers) In Asian and Non-asian Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no LUX-Lung 3 trial sites were located in mainland China, 72% of patients were East Asian, drawn from sites in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand, South Korea and Japan [22]. LUX-Lung 6 was conducted in China, Thailand and South Korea, with almost 90% of afatinib-treated patients from China [23,31].…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%