1976
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.60.7.522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aetiology of keratoconus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
65
2
4

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
65
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although keratoconic patients have a reputation of being 'difficult', 21 this did not appear to be the case with our patients. It is understandable that patients can be initially distressed in view of the debilitating visual loss affecting them at a rather young age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…Although keratoconic patients have a reputation of being 'difficult', 21 this did not appear to be the case with our patients. It is understandable that patients can be initially distressed in view of the debilitating visual loss affecting them at a rather young age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…The overall average annual rate of kertoconus is 2.0 per 100.000 population (Krachmer et al, 1984). The cause of keratoconus is unknown, although some invesigators have reported for the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with this condition (Krachmer et al, 1984;Woodward, 1981;Karseras and Ruben, 1976). Others have suggested a connection between the wearing of hard contact lenses and the development of a keratoconus (Harstein, 1968;Brightbill and Stainer, 1979;Gasset et al, 1978;Sommer, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, AS patients may present with extraskeletal manifestations, such as ocular and cardiac abnormalities [4]. In this patient, either the previously bilateral keratoconus that required perforating keratoplasty, or the mitral prolapse, were attributable to MFS [1,11], whereas the mild aortic insufficiency might be attributable to both diseases [1,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%