1972
DOI: 10.2307/1319461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic Preference in Adolescents as a Function of Race and Visual Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their findings approximated the inverted-U function that had been predicted by Wundt (1874). This function was also obtained with auditory stimuli in studies by Vitz (1966Vitz ( , 1972 and Walker (1973) and with visual stimuli in studies by Munsinger and Kessen (1964), Osborne and Farley (1970), Farley and Dowling (1971), Freedman (1986), and Imamoglu (2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Their findings approximated the inverted-U function that had been predicted by Wundt (1874). This function was also obtained with auditory stimuli in studies by Vitz (1966Vitz ( , 1972 and Walker (1973) and with visual stimuli in studies by Munsinger and Kessen (1964), Osborne and Farley (1970), Farley and Dowling (1971), Freedman (1986), and Imamoglu (2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The familiar sequence occurs; scribble, primitive schema with its characteristic details, and even the adolescent 'plateau'." (8) Lowenfeld and Brittain 9give a detailed description of this developmental sequence in children's art. They describe the following stages: They use the same recognizable symbols as white children for such things as the sun, houses, chimneys (perpendicular to the roof slope), humans and trees.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Art Of Fringe-dwelling Aboriginal Chimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental aesthetics, one of the more investigated phenomena is the so-called complexity preference function, or the generalized tendency for individuals to prefer complexity over Simplicity in a visual display _ A number of studies have been reported in which subjects have indicated a greater preference for complex over simple visual stimuli, whether the visual material is in the form of random polygons varying in the number of sides (the complexity dimension), or in the form of experimentally contrived line drawings varying in judged complexity, or in some other form Farley & Ahn, 1973;Farley & Dowling, 1972)_ Most of the available studies have used experimentally contrived laboratory-type materials. These materials are not of the type normally confronted by children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%