2002
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.3.755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments

Abstract: Aesthetic judgments were investigated using a combined nomothetic and idiographic approach. Participants judged novel graphic patterns with respect to their own personal definitions of "beauty." Judgment analysis was employed to derive individual case models of judgment strategies as well as a group model. As predicted, symmetry had the highest correlations with aesthetic judgments of beauty. Stimulus complexity was the second-highest correlate of a positive evaluation. Thus, there was agreement at the group l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
268
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
14
268
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…and there may be various symmetrical axes but this does not make the property of "being symmetrical" qualitatively gradable. On the other hand, studies on aesthetic judgments of symmetry can assess and measure to what extent people appreciate a particular shape or configuration (e.g., [82][83][84][85]) and this goes to show that symmetrical patterns can be graded from a qualitative point of view based on the observer's assessment of pleasantness. The studies presented in this paper, however, take a different approach.…”
Section: Potential Impact and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and there may be various symmetrical axes but this does not make the property of "being symmetrical" qualitatively gradable. On the other hand, studies on aesthetic judgments of symmetry can assess and measure to what extent people appreciate a particular shape or configuration (e.g., [82][83][84][85]) and this goes to show that symmetrical patterns can be graded from a qualitative point of view based on the observer's assessment of pleasantness. The studies presented in this paper, however, take a different approach.…”
Section: Potential Impact and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preference for symmetry is well documented both in humans (Cardenas & Harris, 2006;Eisenman, 1967;Eysenk, 1941;Frith & Nias, 1974;Jacobsen & Höfel, 2002) and in many other species, from honeybees to chicks (Clara, Regolin, & Vallortigara, 2007;Wignall, Heiling, Cheng, & Herberstein, 2006). Symmetry has also been mentioned as a possible fundamental principle of aesthetics (Ramachandran & Hirstein, 1999) and a potential aesthetic primitive (Latto, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eisenman, 1967;Frith & Nias, 1974;Jacobsen & Höfel, 2002); however, recent work has started to employ implicit measures. Makin, Pecchinenda, and Bertamini (2012a) used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998;Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007) to explore implicit preference for symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symmetry directly determines aesthetic preferences and the subjectively perceived beauty of two-dimensional visual images and patterns [36][37][38][39][40][41], and symmetrical visual patterns are also more easily remembered and recognized [42][43][44] compared with asymmetrical ones. Sabatelli et al [8] suggested that natural and artistic creative processes rely on common, possibly fractal transformations.…”
Section: Nature-inspired Design and The Symmetry Of "Things In A Thing"mentioning
confidence: 99%