2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerothermodynamic considerations for energy deposition based drag reduction technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two types of finite volume based two-dimensional simulations are performed for R-SWBLI under laminar flow assumption. Perfect gas solver 21,23,24 is used for low enthalpy simulations while nonequilibrium flow solver 2527 is employed for high enthalpy condition only. Conventional Navier–Stokes equations are solved for perfect gas flow simulations.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of finite volume based two-dimensional simulations are performed for R-SWBLI under laminar flow assumption. Perfect gas solver 21,23,24 is used for low enthalpy simulations while nonequilibrium flow solver 2527 is employed for high enthalpy condition only. Conventional Navier–Stokes equations are solved for perfect gas flow simulations.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present study, the supersonic inlet and supersonic outlet boundary conditions are used for inlet and outlet of flow computational geometry while the free‐slip boundary condition is considered for wall surfaces. The real gas solver is validated with different numerical and experimental findings as reported in the literature 30–33 . In addition, a well‐validated perfect gas 31,34,35 solver is also employed for the present investigation.…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real gas solver is validated with different numerical and experimental findings as reported in the literature. [30][31][32][33] In addition, a well-validated perfect gas 31,34,35 solver is also employed for the present investigation.…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Erdem et al [274] reported increased stagnation zone aeroheating using DC discharge device while Ohnishi et al [268] reported doubling the stagnation point heat flux values even with cold plasma devices. Based on simulations of Kulkarni et al [275,276] the flow becomes extremely hot ahead of the forebody regardless to the medium. Recently, Ganesh and John [263] predicted undesirable impact of energy devices as far as aeroheating to the forebody is concerned.…”
Section: Ac Electric Discharge 31%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With laserbased energy devices, effectiveness is found sensitive to laser detailed parameters [268]. In addition, increasing the energy source size for a given distance yields more aeroheating reduction but less drag reduction [239,275]. Device effectiveness can be maximized if the energy source size (relative to that of the forebody) is made as small as possible [264,275,283].…”
Section: Factors Controlling the Energy Deposition Devices Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%