Aerosol properties and aerosol–radiation interactions in clear-sky conditions over Germany

Abstract

Abstract. The clear-sky radiative effect of aerosol–radiation interactions is of relevance for our understanding of the climate system. The influence of aerosol on the surface energy budget is of high interest for the renewable energy sector. In this study, the radiative effect is investigated in particular with respect to seasonal and regional variations for the region of Germany and the year 2015 at the surface and top of atmosphere using two complementary approaches. First, an ensemble of clear-sky models which explicitly consider aerosols is utilized to retrieve the aerosol optical depth and the surface direct radiative effect of aerosols by means of a clear-sky fitting technique. For this, short-wave broadband irradiance measurements in the absence of clouds are used as a basis. A clear-sky detection algorithm is used to identify cloud-free observations. Considered are measurements of the short-wave broadband global and diffuse horizontal irradiance with shaded and unshaded pyranometers at 25 stations across Germany within the observational network of the German Weather Service (DWD). The clear-sky models used are the Modified MAC model (MMAC), the Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM) v6.1, the Meteorological–Statistical solar radiation model (METSTAT), the European Solar Radiation Atlas (ESRA), Heliosat-1, the Center for Environment and Man solar radiation model (CEM), and the simplified Solis model. The definition of aerosol and atmospheric characteristics of the models are examined in detail for their suitability for this approach. Second, the radiative effect is estimated using explicit radiative transfer simulations with inputs on the meteorological state of the atmosphere, trace gases and aerosol from the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis. The aerosol optical properties (aerosol optical depth, Ångström exponent, single scattering albedo and asymmetry parameter) are first evaluated with AERONET direct sun and inversion products. The largest inconsistency is found for the aerosol absorption, which is overestimated by about 0.03 or about 30 % by the CAMS reanalysis. Compared to the DWD observational network, the simulated global, direct and diffuse irradiances show reasonable agreement within the measurement uncertainty. The radiative kernel method is used to estimate the resulting uncertainty and bias of the simulated direct radiative effect. The uncertainty is estimated to −1.5 ± 7.7 and 0.6 ± 3.5 W m−2 at the surface and top of atmosphere, respectively, while the annual-mean biases at the surface, top of atmosphere and total atmosphere are −10.6, −6.5 and 4.1 W m−2, respectively. The retrieval of the aerosol radiative effect with the clear-sky models shows a high level of agreement with the radiative transfer simulations, with an RMSE of 5.8 W m−2 and a correlation of 0.75. The annual mean of the REari at the surface for the 25 DWD stations shows a value of −12.8 ± 5 W m−2 as the average over the clear-sky models, compared to −11 W m−2 from the radiative transfer simulations. Since all models assume a fixed aerosol characterization, the annual cycle of the aerosol radiation effect cannot be reproduced. Out of this set of clear-sky models, the largest level of agreement is shown by the ESRA and MRM v6.1 models.

The impact of coupled 3D radiative transfer on surface radiation and cumulus clouds over land

“…We chose to use the aerosol data from CAMS (Inness et al, 2019a) for this purpose, as it is also used e.g. in IFS (Bozzo et al, 2017) and to study aerosol-radiation interactions in Witthuhn et al (2021). The dataset includes information for 11 different aerosol types, namely organic matter (hydrophilic and hydrophobic), black carbon (hydrophilic and hydrophobic), sea salt (in 3 size ranges), dust (in 3 size ranges), and sulphates.…”

Influence of cloudy/clear-sky partitions, aerosols and geometry on the recent variability of surface solar irradiance's components in northern France

“…Numerous studies in the literature have assessed the direct radiative impact of aerosols, both globally (Yu et al, 2006;Bellouin et al, 2013;Thorsen et al, 2020;Kinne, 2019;Zhou et al, 2005) and regionally (Papadimas et al, 2012;Nabat et al, 2014;Witthuhn et al, 2021;Bartók, 2017;Neher et al, 2019). Most of these studies focus on the net radiative impact of aerosols, which is the difference between net radiation incident at the surface (i.e.…”

Low-level Arctic clouds: A blind zone in our knowledge of the radiation budget

“…We propose a method to reduce downward radiative flux biases of low-level stratus clouds (LLS) by evaluating the flux differences between 1-D radiative transfer simulations and observations collected during the PS106 cruise. The simulations were performed with the TROPOS (Leibniz Institute of Tropospheric Research) Cloud and Aerosol Radiative effect Simulator (T-CARS) (Barlakas et al, 2020;Witthuhn et al, 2021;Barrientos-Velasco et al, 2022). Cloud properties derived by the instrument synergy approach Cloudnet (Illingworth et al, 2007;Tukiainen et al, 2020) served as realistic input parameters for the radiative transfer simulations and the surface radiation measurements of the OCEANET-Atmosphere facility (hereafter referred to as OCEANET) as true validation data.…”