2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Simultaneous Detection of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons and Inorganic Components from Individual Particles

Abstract: Online studies of single airborne particles represent a demanding challenge in aerosol chemistry. New technologies that help to unravel the role of ambient aerosols in earth climate and to assess local and specific health risks from air pollution are highly desired. Of particular relevance are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from combustion processes that are associated with both acute and longterm health effects. Usually, online single particle analyses apply laser desorption/ionization (LDI) in a bip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PALMS and other SPMS instruments that use single-step laser desorption-ionization (LDI) are not inherently quantitative because ion formation is not a well-controlled process and gives rise to 15 considerable particle-to-particle variability in both total and relative ion signals (Hinz and Spengler, 2007;Murphy, 2007). Many bulk aerosol mass spectrometers (Canagaratna et al, 2007;Tobias et al, 2000) and some SPMS instruments (Passig et al, 2017;Simpson et al, 2009;Sykes et al, 2002) use a two-step particle desorption and ionization process that can more readily quantify particle sub-components. Very high laser irradiances generate plasmas that can also improve consistency in ion signals but at the expense of losing all molecular information (Wang and Johnston, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PALMS and other SPMS instruments that use single-step laser desorption-ionization (LDI) are not inherently quantitative because ion formation is not a well-controlled process and gives rise to 15 considerable particle-to-particle variability in both total and relative ion signals (Hinz and Spengler, 2007;Murphy, 2007). Many bulk aerosol mass spectrometers (Canagaratna et al, 2007;Tobias et al, 2000) and some SPMS instruments (Passig et al, 2017;Simpson et al, 2009;Sykes et al, 2002) use a two-step particle desorption and ionization process that can more readily quantify particle sub-components. Very high laser irradiances generate plasmas that can also improve consistency in ion signals but at the expense of losing all molecular information (Wang and Johnston, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For online gas phase REMPI-MS measurements [24][25][26] or direct REMPI-MS analysis of liquid samples with either membrane inlet [27][28][29] or direct inlet techniques [30], a native or isotope labeled internal standard (e.g., toluene or D3-toluene) can be added to semi-quantify the polycyclic aromatic compounds via relPICS. Additionally, for REMPI-based analytical techniques, which do not allow a straight forward internal standardization approach, such as laser desorption REMPI-MS online analysis of PAHs on a single aerosol particle [31], the relPICS allow the determination of the pattern of the aromatic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a two-step approach separating laser ablation and laser ionization bears several advantages for identifying specific molecules (Passig et al, 2017) many instruments currently still use single-step laser desorption and ionization. Single-particle mass spectrometers currently in use by different groups worldwide have very similar designs (Gaie-Levrel et al, 2012;Johnston, 2000;Murphy and Thomson, 1995;Zelenyuk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%