2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-09396-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol Jet Printing of SU-8 as a Passivation Layer Against Ionic Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cross-sectional SEM image of this pristine SU-8 film is presented in Figure S2D, showing a ∼1 μm extension beyond the contact, which is a parameter that could play a role in the quality of SU-8's ability to passivate the electrodes. 51 The effects of soft-bake times are further confirmed by profilometry studies, which show that nonpassivated contacts (Figure S3A) and intact SU-8-passivated contacts made with a <30 s soft-bake (Figure S3B) consistently yield heights of ∼40 and ∼450 nm, respectively, whereas delaminated SU-8 (resulting from soft-bake times >60 s) yields unpredictable and nonuniform heights (Figure S3C). The average values collected over several measurements in Figure S3D for each contact also contrast the consistency in the height profile of intact SU-8 and the high variability of delaminated (>60 s soft-baked) SU-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cross-sectional SEM image of this pristine SU-8 film is presented in Figure S2D, showing a ∼1 μm extension beyond the contact, which is a parameter that could play a role in the quality of SU-8's ability to passivate the electrodes. 51 The effects of soft-bake times are further confirmed by profilometry studies, which show that nonpassivated contacts (Figure S3A) and intact SU-8-passivated contacts made with a <30 s soft-bake (Figure S3B) consistently yield heights of ∼40 and ∼450 nm, respectively, whereas delaminated SU-8 (resulting from soft-bake times >60 s) yields unpredictable and nonuniform heights (Figure S3C). The average values collected over several measurements in Figure S3D for each contact also contrast the consistency in the height profile of intact SU-8 and the high variability of delaminated (>60 s soft-baked) SU-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Contrarily, imaging of Pd contacts with 0–30 s soft-baked SU-8 (Figures E and S2B) shows a pristine SU-8 film, as indicated by a uniform green hue on the contacts that is characteristic of SU-8. A cross-sectional SEM image of this pristine SU-8 film is presented in Figure S2D, showing a ∼1 μm extension beyond the contact, which is a parameter that could play a role in the quality of SU-8’s ability to passivate the electrodes . The effects of soft-bake times are further confirmed by profilometry studies, which show that nonpassivated contacts (Figure S3A) and intact SU-8-passivated contacts made with a <30 s soft-bake (Figure S3B) consistently yield heights of ∼40 and ∼450 nm, respectively, whereas delaminated SU-8 (resulting from soft-bake times >60 s) yields unpredictable and nonuniform heights (Figure S3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies are present on some conductive, semiconductive, and dielectric polymeric inks. [ 33–46 ] Tarabella et al. and Hong et al studied the effect of the focusing ratio (FR), that is, the ratio between the ShGFR and the DrGFR, on the line width and thickness of PEDOT:PSS lines to fabricate conductive patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies are present on some conductive, semiconductive, and dielectric polymeric inks. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] Tarabella et al and Hong et al studied the effect of the focusing ratio (FR), that is, the ratio between the ShGFR and the DrGFR, on the line width and thickness of PEDOT:PSS lines to fabricate conductive patterns. [33,34] Zips et al, instead, used AJP printing to fabricate micro-needles made of PEDOT:PSS loaded with carbon nanotubes for bioelectronic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation