1969
DOI: 10.1021/es60028a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol filtration by means of Nuclepore filters: aerosol sampling and measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it was understandable that filters were not very effective to remove ROS in this phase. However, depending on the pore size of the polycarbonate filters used in their study, there could be substantial penetration of the smoke particles through the filter pores (Spurny et al 1969a(Spurny et al , 1969b resulting in an underestimation of the particle-bound ROS. In the present study, the particulate phase was the major source of ROS and it was reasonable that filters could eliminate particle-bound ROS and PM mass.…”
Section: Effect Of Cigarette Filtersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, it was understandable that filters were not very effective to remove ROS in this phase. However, depending on the pore size of the polycarbonate filters used in their study, there could be substantial penetration of the smoke particles through the filter pores (Spurny et al 1969a(Spurny et al , 1969b resulting in an underestimation of the particle-bound ROS. In the present study, the particulate phase was the major source of ROS and it was reasonable that filters could eliminate particle-bound ROS and PM mass.…”
Section: Effect Of Cigarette Filtersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Spurny et al (1969b and1974) studied the time development of pressure drop in Nuclepore lters in an attempt to understand clogging mechanisms. Three different clogging stages were identi ed.…”
Section: Nuclepore Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each face velocity and pore size, the values of constants A 0 and x1, along with their corresponding p -values are presented. The results of Table 3 clearly show that x1 (i.e., the slope of the regression line) for each con guration is statistically not different from zero, thereby indicating that d (D P )/ cm / t is independent of particle size for particles in the size range of 0.2-1.0 m m. The value of A 0 represents the average increase in pressure drop per unit time and mass concentration for each con guration for particles in the size rages 0.2-1.0 m m. The observed increase in d(D P )/ cm / t for particles smaller than 0.2 m m is probably due to additional particle deposition by diffusion inside the pores, a mechanism that is expected to be more pronounced with decreasing particle size (Spurny et al 1969b;Manton 1978).…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice and theory of track-etched filters for airborne particle sampling and microscopic collection has been reported [48,151 ], interesting applications being the sampling of radioactive aerosols [49,1521 and nuclei sampling as low as 103nm diameter used to predict an aerosol's residence time [153].…”
Section: Production Of Fine Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%