2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol emissions from a marine diesel engine running on different fuels and effects of exhaust gas cleaning measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The petroporphyrins data set, used in the previous section for extraction of KMD series and improved molecular attribution, was used to plot the DBE vs #C map of extracted metal–organic constituents presented in Figure . For this figure, the data from two samples were selected to be compared: a feed bunker ship fuel (heavy fuel oil, fuel sulfur content > 0.5 wt %) and its primary combustion aerosol gathered at the engine exhaust of a research ship diesel engine . The FC color coding in Figure shows that most porphyrins were solely detected in the feed fuel (purple dots) or detected with lower intensity (red dots) in the corresponding aerosol emission, suggesting an overall total consumption through combustion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The petroporphyrins data set, used in the previous section for extraction of KMD series and improved molecular attribution, was used to plot the DBE vs #C map of extracted metal–organic constituents presented in Figure . For this figure, the data from two samples were selected to be compared: a feed bunker ship fuel (heavy fuel oil, fuel sulfur content > 0.5 wt %) and its primary combustion aerosol gathered at the engine exhaust of a research ship diesel engine . The FC color coding in Figure shows that most porphyrins were solely detected in the feed fuel (purple dots) or detected with lower intensity (red dots) in the corresponding aerosol emission, suggesting an overall total consumption through combustion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1 L min −1 aerosol transported to the SPMS system, 0.1 L min −1 was guided into the instrument. Further details of the sampling setup were given by Jeong et al 7…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While nearly all air pollutants in Europe and the U.S. have decreased within the last few decades, ship emissions have changed less and currently contribute substantially to the total emissions of PM 2.5. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Regulations target the fuel sulfur content by a global 0.5% sulfur cap since 2020 and a maximum of 0.1% S in sulfur emission control areas (SECAs), e.g. along the U.S. coast, the entire North Sea and Baltic Sea as well as in many harbors and coastal regions worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the setup and sampling conditions can be found elsewhere. 26 The investigated ship fuels include two IMO noncompliant high-sulfur (HS) heavy fuel oils (commercial marine HS-HFO (2.16% m/m S), noncommercial HS-HFO SYN (1.02% m/m S)), as well as three IMO compliant marine fuels: commercial marine gas oil (MGO a diesel-like fuel), a low-sulfur HFO (LS-HFO, 0.5% m/m S), and a noncommercial aromatic-rich ultralow-sulfur heavy fuel oil (ULS-HFO AR , 0.05% m/m S). HS-HFO SYN is a mixture (30:70) of two low-and high-boiling fractions of the crude oil refining process.…”
Section: Particulate Matter Sampling and Hulis Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%