2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol dry deposition in the urban environment: Assessment of deposition velocity on building facades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in other surrogate surfaces recovery efficiency is usually between 60 and 80 %. Maro et al (2014) collected aerosol dry deposition on building facades. Deposition of particles on building facades is a relatively slow process.…”
Section: Discussion On Various Methods Of Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But in other surrogate surfaces recovery efficiency is usually between 60 and 80 %. Maro et al (2014) collected aerosol dry deposition on building facades. Deposition of particles on building facades is a relatively slow process.…”
Section: Discussion On Various Methods Of Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this type of studies, long-term sampling could not provide representative data as particles may be washed out by rain. It is well known that dry deposition on surfaces results from a combination of several processes such as gravitational settling, Brownian diffusion, impaction, interception, thermophoresis, diffusiophoresis and electrostatic attraction (Maro et al 2014). Gravitational settling is expected to play no role in dry deposition on vertical surfaces.…”
Section: Discussion On Various Methods Of Flux Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Torre Sarca has been active as an atmospheric monitoring station since 2005, and its long-time series of PM 2.5 samples collection has resulted particularly useful to estimate the TOW and Ncy over the last decade. The deposition of PM on monuments and building facades is an extremely troubled issue, in which several mechanisms may contribute (Brownian diffusion, impaction and interception due to the turbulent motions, gravitational sedimentation, thermophoresis, diffusiophoresis, electrostatic attraction) (Maro et al, 2014). PM 2.5 was chosen as it represents an important fraction in the deposition mechanism occurring on vertical surfaces (Nava et al, 2010).…”
Section: Sampling Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM 2.5 was chosen as it represents an important fraction in the deposition mechanism occurring on vertical surfaces (Nava et al, 2010). Concerning dry deposition on vertical surfaces, the sedimentation is expected to be negligible, since it occurs mainly for the coarse fraction (i.e., PM 2.5-10 ), and the turbulent diffusion is assumed as the main mechanism (Maro et al, 2014). Moreover, fine particles have a longer residence time in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Sampling Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%