1997
DOI: 10.1364/ao.36.003475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol and cloud backscatter at 106, 154, and 053 µm by airborne hard-target-calibrated Nd:YAG/methane Raman lidar

Abstract: A lidar instrument was developed to make simultaneous measurements at three distinct wavelengths in the visible and near infrared at 0.532, 1.064, and 1.54 mum with high cross-sectional calibration accuracy. Aerosol and cloud backscatter cross sections were acquired during November and December 1989 and May and June 1990 by the NASA DC-8 aircraft as part of the Global Backscatter Experiment. The instrument, methodology, and measurement results are described. A Nd:YAG laser produced 1.064- and 0.532-mum energy.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The airborne lidar used in this study was the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Visible and Infrared Lidar (VIRL) system [Spinhirne et al, 1997], which is based on a Nd:YAG laser with a peak pulse energy of 150 mJ and a 50 Hz pulse rate. For the TOGA/COARE flights there were two linearly polarized 1.064 gm channels, plus 0.532 and 2.047 I•m total signal channels.…”
Section: The Toga/coare Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The airborne lidar used in this study was the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Visible and Infrared Lidar (VIRL) system [Spinhirne et al, 1997], which is based on a Nd:YAG laser with a peak pulse energy of 150 mJ and a 50 Hz pulse rate. For the TOGA/COARE flights there were two linearly polarized 1.064 gm channels, plus 0.532 and 2.047 I•m total signal channels.…”
Section: The Toga/coare Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's important to remark that, because of the large degree of variability of real atmospheric situations, the shape of real lidar signals and its random noise makes it difficult to implement these concepts with an automated method [7]. Also, the application of the derivative or the variance to a lidar signal depends on the spatial resolution of the range-corrected signals [12], or in other cases, the definition of threshold values (like in [8], [9] or [15]). Limitations of derivative and variance method have been reported in [16], where different metrological situations could lead to fail in the detection of ABL height.…”
Section: False-positive Of the Methods And Constraints For The Width Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples are the large National Air and Space Administration (NASA) DC-8 airborne LIDAR systems, used by Browell et al, (37,38) McCormik et al, (39,40) and others, (41) which measured stratospheric aerosols, such as, for instance, the very early Pinatubo cloud, PSCs, tropospheric clouds, and aerosols. On the ER-2 a small compact LIDAR system was developed by Spinhirne and Hart.…”
Section: The Light Detection and Ranging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%