1995
DOI: 10.1007/s002770050120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol amphotericin B inhalations for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic cancer patients

Abstract: To determine the value of aerosol amphotericin B inhalations for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), we initiated a prospective randomized multicenter trial. The scheduled intent-to-treat interim analysis included 115 patients (30%) with prolonged neutropenia after chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia/high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, or solid tumors undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Sixty-five patients had been randomized to receive prophylact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerosolized medication regimens are an attractive option, as drug interactions and systemic toxicities are likely to be limited (4, 5). Several centers have reported on the safety of aerosolized amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) with a variety of dosing regimens (6–9). A few centers have reported on the safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) (5, 10–12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosolized medication regimens are an attractive option, as drug interactions and systemic toxicities are likely to be limited (4, 5). Several centers have reported on the safety of aerosolized amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBd) with a variety of dosing regimens (6–9). A few centers have reported on the safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) (5, 10–12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid‐based formulations are less nephrotoxic but significantly more expensive and have not been shown to provide effective prophylaxis (Kelsey et al , 1999). The efficacy of low doses intravenously or nebulized formulations by inhalation is also unproven (Behre et al , 1997; Perfect et al , 1992; Riley et al , 1994; Tsourounis & Guglielmo, 1996). Orally administered polyenes (amphotericin B and nystatin) provide less effective prophylaxis than fluconazole (Philpott‐Howard et al , 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will not have any influence on the course of disease in patients who may have acquired the fungus before they are admitted. Also there are no data to show that it is even effective in this context ( 40), and even when administered properly it is poorly tolerated ( 41).…”
Section: Strategies For Managing Ifidmentioning
confidence: 99%