2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2014.2328436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeromagnetic Compensation in Gradiometry—Performance, Model Stability, and Robustness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an additional flight consisting of the same maneuvers as the calibration flight is necessary [20], and only then, the robustness can be evaluated with the cross-calibration index [4] defined as…”
Section: A Test Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, an additional flight consisting of the same maneuvers as the calibration flight is necessary [20], and only then, the robustness can be evaluated with the cross-calibration index [4] defined as…”
Section: A Test Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a large crosscalibration index indicates that the estimated coefficients are nonrobust [20]. The performance of an actual compensation system depends not only on the system itself but also on other external factors, e.g., the quality of the installation on the aircraft [20], which can be addressed in a separate way.…”
Section: A Test Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…efficient aeromagnetic survey [2]. Many methods have been proposed to estimate the coefficients of the Tolles-Lawson model [3]- [6] and to improve their accuracy [7], [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%