58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic Tailoring using the Spars and Stringers Planform Geometry

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. The aeroelastic performance of a wing, including static aeroelastic shape, flutter/divergence speed and gust load response, has a significant influence on aircraft design. The tailoring of aeroelastic responses therefore offers potential weight savings. In this paper, the spars and stringers planform geometry (i.e. shape and root/tip chord wise location) on a re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All beam properties, including the second moment of area I 1 , are calculated from the GFEM static deflections due to tip loads as detailed in the next section. Aeroelastic analyses are then performed using the beam model (5), generating aeroelastic constraint values g 1 (6), external loads L (7) and associated gradients with respect to the beam model properties (8). The external loads are applied to the GFEM model for stress analysis (9), which outputs the stress constraint values g 2 (10) and their gradients with respect to the optimization variables ∂g 2 /∂v, and with respect to the applied loads ∂g 2 /∂L (11).…”
Section: Fig 1 Aeroelastic Optimization With Detailed Stress Constramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All beam properties, including the second moment of area I 1 , are calculated from the GFEM static deflections due to tip loads as detailed in the next section. Aeroelastic analyses are then performed using the beam model (5), generating aeroelastic constraint values g 1 (6), external loads L (7) and associated gradients with respect to the beam model properties (8). The external loads are applied to the GFEM model for stress analysis (9), which outputs the stress constraint values g 2 (10) and their gradients with respect to the optimization variables ∂g 2 /∂v, and with respect to the applied loads ∂g 2 /∂L (11).…”
Section: Fig 1 Aeroelastic Optimization With Detailed Stress Constramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One application of MDO is the design of aerostructures subject to aerodynamic, stress and aeroelastic constraints. Existing wing MDO implementations, such as those described in [1][2][3][4][5][6], tend to use three-dimensional global finite element models (GFEMs)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability of numerical models to accurately predict the flexibility of aerospace structures has therefore become central to further improve aeroelastic performance, e.g. aeroelastic tailoring [1][2][3]. Furthermore, considering the reliance on computer software and the critical choices that must be made during early design phases, the development of accurate, yet rapid, structural analysis methods is of paramount importance for aerospace applications [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Jutte et al (2014) have implemented few aeroelastic tailoring methods which also includes the usage of curvilinear rib and spar with varying orientation, tow steering composite laminates and also material and thickness grading on a CRM wing box [18]. Meanwhile, Francios et al (2017) have focused on the modification of spars and stringers planform geometry of a simple rectangular wing box model [19]. All in all, these research works have shown significant effect of curvilinear spars and ribs on the improvement of wing performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%