39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-1757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic tailoring for improved UAV performance

Abstract: This paper describes how aeroelastic tailoring, in concert with optimal composite material design, might be applied to a new generation of Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV's) to increase range and improve lateral control effectiveness. UAV development provides a new venue for design because it encourages creativity by removing some design constraints. This paper reviews: 1) design opportunities provided by UAV missions; 2) and, aeroelastic tailoring features mat lend themselves to improved performance. The aeroelast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wash-in effect is also often present for an aerodynamically loaded straight wing, as the EA is usually behind the aerodynamic center. For the aft swept wing, moving the EA forward increases the natural wash-out (leading edge down), which also helps reduce the load [15]. The load alleviation effect caused by moving the EA forward contributes to the reduction of the failure metric when increasing the leading edge thickness, or using a stiffer material at the leading edge with chord-wise grading.…”
Section: B Thickness Vs Materials Gradingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The wash-in effect is also often present for an aerodynamically loaded straight wing, as the EA is usually behind the aerodynamic center. For the aft swept wing, moving the EA forward increases the natural wash-out (leading edge down), which also helps reduce the load [15]. The load alleviation effect caused by moving the EA forward contributes to the reduction of the failure metric when increasing the leading edge thickness, or using a stiffer material at the leading edge with chord-wise grading.…”
Section: B Thickness Vs Materials Gradingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is a clear attempt to globally stiffen the overall wing structure for stress reduction, but is not necessarily an aeroelastic tailoring strategy. The migration of the flexural axis [20] is very minor towards the left end of this front, and actually moves in a direction so as to slightly decrease the bend-twist wash-out (load-alleviation), rather than the desired increase. On the opposite end of the front (designs with high flutter dynamic pressures, i.e.…”
Section: Materials and Thickness Gradingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The resulting data set was distilled into structural weight, wing tip deflection/twist, and an aggregate stress metric (Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) function [19]), where low values are desirable. The line of centers of gravity from root to tip were also computed, along with the flexural axis, which is a locus of points along the wing at which, in response to an applied load at their locations, the wing deforms without a change in the local angle of attack [20]. Buckling eigenvalues were also computed for each deformed state and the corresponding buckling mode.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the prediction of aeroelastic characteristics is an important field of research [26]. This is especially true for flexible high-aspect-ratio wings studied in their application to high-altitude long-endurance aircraft [27,28].…”
Section: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Design Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%