2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic instability of a composite wing with a powered-engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the quasi-steady model, the flutter speed slightly decreases as the engine moves from the wing root to around 25% of the span (x e = 0.25), further sliding towards the wing tip increases the flutter speed. These results show agreement with those in [22]. The flutter frequency decreases by moving the engine towards the wing tip for the two aerodynamic models.…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the quasi-steady model, the flutter speed slightly decreases as the engine moves from the wing root to around 25% of the span (x e = 0.25), further sliding towards the wing tip increases the flutter speed. These results show agreement with those in [22]. The flutter frequency decreases by moving the engine towards the wing tip for the two aerodynamic models.…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For both of the aerodynamic models, the flutter frequency increases as the engine slides from the leading edge to the trailing edge. Indeed, similar behaviour was obtained in [21] and [22], where in the former it was pointed out that moving the engine from trailing edge to the leading edge in chord-wise direction makes the wing more stable. …”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, based on the trajectory optimization, we ignores the influence of temperature and establish the equation of wing flutter carrying with the propulsion system. Therefore, compared with (Amoozgar, 2013;Mardanpour et al, 2014;Mazidi et al, 2013) previous studies, our research is of great significance. (ii) In order to reveal the negative effect of the conventional control on the stability of aeroelastic system (Cassaro & Battipede, 2015;Huang et al, 2015;Singh, 2015;Wang et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2013;Zhao, 2009Zhao, , 2011 and consider the influence of faults, time delay, input saturation, time-varying parameter uncertainties and external disturbances, this paper focuses on the design of finite-time H 1 adaptive fault-tolerant controller for flutter of wing with propulsion system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Flutter instability of elastic systems subjected to non-conservative forces have been studied by many authors (Amoozgar, 2013;Mardanpour, Richards, Nabipour, & Hodges, 2014;Mazidi, Kalantari, & Fazelzadeh, 2013). Amoozgar (2013) investigated the aeroelastic instability of a wing model, which behaves as an orthotropic composite beam with a concentrated mass subjected to the engine thrust; Wagner function is used to model the unsteady aerodynamic loads, while the engine thrust is modeled as a follower force and a concentrated mass is used to model the engine mass. Mardanpour et al (2014) using the code NATASHA (Nonlinear Aeroelastic Trim And Stability of HALE Aircraft) investigated the effects of multiple engine placement on flutter characteristics of a backswept flying wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%