2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic global structural optimization using an efficient CFD-based reduced order model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between the POD/ROM, CFD/CSD aeroelastic model and experimental data is good for all Mach numbers considered (0.499 to 1.141), including the well-known transonic dip of the flutter speed. The accuracy of full-order CFD/CSD aeroelastic model and POD/ROM solver have been evaluated over the years in a number of aeroelastic studies [16,34,36,52,53].The good agreement indicates that the POD/ROM solver has near the same accuracy as the nonlinear CFD model at small or moderate perturbation.…”
Section: Pod/rom Solver Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agreement between the POD/ROM, CFD/CSD aeroelastic model and experimental data is good for all Mach numbers considered (0.499 to 1.141), including the well-known transonic dip of the flutter speed. The accuracy of full-order CFD/CSD aeroelastic model and POD/ROM solver have been evaluated over the years in a number of aeroelastic studies [16,34,36,52,53].The good agreement indicates that the POD/ROM solver has near the same accuracy as the nonlinear CFD model at small or moderate perturbation.…”
Section: Pod/rom Solver Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have been developed and implemented an efficient aeroelastic CFD-based POD/ROM [34], which avoids the burden of reconstructing CFD-based POD/ROMs associated the exact model. The efficient aeroelastic CFD-based POD/ROM has been successfully applied to passive flutter suppression with high accuracy and efficiency, such as aeroelastic tailoring [35] and aeroelastic structural optimisation [36]. However, most of above-mentioned studies only considered the CFD-based ROMs for active or passive flutter suppression alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%