2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamics of spinning and non-spinning tennis balls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass reduction is dominated by a loss of felt and has been shown to increase with both impact speed and number of impacts [5]. The felt cover has been shown to degrade causing mass reduction and changes in fuzziness, in turn affecting the aerodynamic properties of the ball [7,8]. Furthermore, it has been acknowledged that balls may fall out of specification during use if the initial properties were close to the allowable limits when approval tested [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass reduction is dominated by a loss of felt and has been shown to increase with both impact speed and number of impacts [5]. The felt cover has been shown to degrade causing mass reduction and changes in fuzziness, in turn affecting the aerodynamic properties of the ball [7,8]. Furthermore, it has been acknowledged that balls may fall out of specification during use if the initial properties were close to the allowable limits when approval tested [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency in drag coefficient for a non-spinning ball, using both experimental arrangements, lends confidence to the methodology used, especially considering that previous studies have found that the support arrangement used can have an effect on the measured drag coefficient [13].…”
Section: Aerodynamics Of a Smooth Spherementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The tare drag was found to be quite high, accounting for almost half the total drag measured on the ball-sting arrangement and although this amount of tare drag was unexpected, it was thought to be due to the relatively large cross-section of the sting, which had been designed to be sturdy and prevent any unwanted vibrations in the ball-sting arrangement. Work on tennis ball aerodynamics, since this research was carried out, reduced the tare drag slightly by redesigning the shrouding of the sting [13].…”
Section: The Effect Of Velocity On Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gravity, air resistance, Magnus force, and so on [3,4].The air resistance has the greatest impact on the flight trajectory of tennis.Many factors can affect the air resistance, including the Reynolds number of the flow field around the tennis, the compressibility of airflow, the turbulence characteristics, and the roughness of tennis surface [5][6][7]. The topspin tennis rotates along the corresponding direction because of the certain torque.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%