2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic shape optimization by continually moving ROM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System identification [14] and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) [15] are the two most commonly used ROMs in CFD-based aeroelastic analysis. The CFD-based ROMs have been also exercised for transonic [16] and hypersonic [17] aeroelastic analysis, limit-cycle oscillation (LCO) [18], gust response analysis [19], aerodynamic shape optimisation [20,21], and blade aerodynamic force [22,23]. In particular, the last decade has witnessed various studies on the developments of the CFD-based ROMs for active flutter suppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification [14] and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) [15] are the two most commonly used ROMs in CFD-based aeroelastic analysis. The CFD-based ROMs have been also exercised for transonic [16] and hypersonic [17] aeroelastic analysis, limit-cycle oscillation (LCO) [18], gust response analysis [19], aerodynamic shape optimisation [20,21], and blade aerodynamic force [22,23]. In particular, the last decade has witnessed various studies on the developments of the CFD-based ROMs for active flutter suppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%