1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80010-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic, laryngoscopic, and perceptual-acoustic characteristics in dysphonic females with posterior glottal chinks: A retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A benefit of this particular model was the opportunity to vary one feature at a time, teasing apart the impact of incomplete glottal closure from altered subglottal pressure, amplitude of vibration, mucosal wave, symmetry, and regularity. It is likely that the ambiguous relationship between gap size and breathiness in human subjects (e.g., Rammage et al, 1992) occurs because gap size is not the only feature differing among study participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A benefit of this particular model was the opportunity to vary one feature at a time, teasing apart the impact of incomplete glottal closure from altered subglottal pressure, amplitude of vibration, mucosal wave, symmetry, and regularity. It is likely that the ambiguous relationship between gap size and breathiness in human subjects (e.g., Rammage et al, 1992) occurs because gap size is not the only feature differing among study participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though correlation between the size of the glottal gap and breathiness is not always high (Södersten & Lindestad, 1990; Rammage, 1992), increasing vocal process separation, parameterized by ξ 02 , caused decreasing CPP in SS11 and is expected to increase perceived breathiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of its attractiveness stems from the idea that they might supply a way to quantitatively assess voice characteristics that are otherwise difficult to measure ͑e.g., Kreiman and Gerratt, 1996͒. Studies on pathological voices have correlated acoustic features with perceptual qualities ͑Murry et al., 1977;Hammarberg et al, 1980Hammarberg et al, , 1981Fritzell et al, 1983a;Askenfelt and Hammarberg, 1986;Hirano et al, 1986Hirano et al, , 1988Eskenazi et al, 1990;Rammage et al, 1992;Kreiman et al, 1992;Kreiman and Gerratt, 1994;Dejonckere, 1995;de Krom, 1995;Bielamowicz et al, 1996;Hillenbrand and Houde, 1996͒ or, to a lesser extent, with physiologic conditions at the glottis ͑Hirano et Rammage et al, 1992͒. However, the results are often ambiguous, and sometimes even contradictory, so the choice of the appropriate acoustic measures as well as their interpretation are still unsolved problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material has a number of practical advantages. Production of an isolated vowel, especially vowels such as /a/ [16], is not affected by articulation factors. Stabilized isolated vowels have also been shown to be useful for objective voice evaluation of frequency and intensity stability (jitter and shimmer) and glottal closure (phonatory airflow) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%