“…Some of its attractiveness stems from the idea that they might supply a way to quantitatively assess voice characteristics that are otherwise difficult to measure ͑e.g., Kreiman and Gerratt, 1996͒. Studies on pathological voices have correlated acoustic features with perceptual qualities ͑Murry et al., 1977;Hammarberg et al, 1980Hammarberg et al, , 1981Fritzell et al, 1983a;Askenfelt and Hammarberg, 1986;Hirano et al, 1986Hirano et al, , 1988Eskenazi et al, 1990;Rammage et al, 1992;Kreiman et al, 1992;Kreiman and Gerratt, 1994;Dejonckere, 1995;de Krom, 1995;Bielamowicz et al, 1996;Hillenbrand and Houde, 1996͒ or, to a lesser extent, with physiologic conditions at the glottis ͑Hirano et Rammage et al, 1992͒. However, the results are often ambiguous, and sometimes even contradictory, so the choice of the appropriate acoustic measures as well as their interpretation are still unsolved problems.…”