2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.110018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic forces acting on birds during flight: A comparative study of a shorebird, songbird and a strigiform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that all measurements were extracted from perch-toperch flight rather than steady flight, limiting the statistical sample to a few flapping cycles and increasing the uncertainties in estimating the aerodynamic forces. Nevertheless, the prediction of the drag force for the present case is in line with experimental observations (Nafi et al 2020). The changes in drag over the wingbeat cycle include an apparent negative drag during the transition phase, which has been reported by Ben-Gida et al (2013), associating it to the unsteady drag contribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to the fact that all measurements were extracted from perch-toperch flight rather than steady flight, limiting the statistical sample to a few flapping cycles and increasing the uncertainties in estimating the aerodynamic forces. Nevertheless, the prediction of the drag force for the present case is in line with experimental observations (Nafi et al 2020). The changes in drag over the wingbeat cycle include an apparent negative drag during the transition phase, which has been reported by Ben-Gida et al (2013), associating it to the unsteady drag contribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The drag force remains almost constant throughout the entire wingbeat except during the transition phase from upstroke to downstroke, where a sharp drop is observed. This observation is in qualitative agreement with the experimental observations by Nafi et al (2020), where the variation of the drag force extracted from PIV measurements in the wake of a boobook owl flying freely and steadily in a wind tunnel was reported. The mean value of the drag coefficient is C mean D ¼ 0:12.…”
Section: Wake Structure and Aerodynamic Forcessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that drag coefficient is computed for a sequence of velocity maps, and therefore it does not require a priori information of the reconstructed wake. The variation of the cumulative circulatory lift coefficient ∆C lcirc can be estimated from the PIV velocity vector fields based on Stalnov et al [24], Ben-Gida et al [25] and Nafi et al [26]. Any fluid motion around a body is accompanied by the shedding of vortices into the wake.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And it is not easy to make reliable predictions of transient aerodynamic forces using unsteady aerodynamics theory. Nafi et al [8] estimated the aerodynamic forces on freely flying birds by analyzing the wingbeat kinematics and near-wake flow measurements using longduration time-resolved particle image velocimetry. Lentink et al [9] developed a method to measure aerodynamic forces on flying animals and biomimetic robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%