1990
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3290150307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic entrainment thresholds and dislodgement rates on impervious and permeable beds

Abstract: In the literature it has been suggested that on permeable, granular beds, both the threshold and rate of aerodynamic entrainment may be affected significantly by seepage flows into and out of the bed induced by fluctuating pressures in the overlying turbulent boundary layer. Using a range of grain sizes and flow conditions, the series of laboratory experiments reported here compares directly the aerodynamic entrainment of loose grains overlying fixed permeable sediment beds with that occuring over fixed imperv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simulate more accurately the aerodynamic and sedimentary characteristics of a flat sediment bed, it was necessary to create artificially a rough, granular surface on the leading edge and working sections of the plate. This also provided a fixed surface of uniform geometry over the entire working area upon which loose grains could be placed.. As previous research had demonstrated that, for well sorted sediments, bed permeability has no detectable effect on entrainment dynamics of threshold shear velocity (Williams et al, 1990b), it was concluded that a single layer of grains would provide the necessary consistency of particle packing whilst not adversely affecting threshold determinations. Covering the surface of the plate with fixed grains, however, meant acceptance that boundary layer development would be influenced significantly by roughness elements and that, consequently, its precise properties could not be predicted numerically.…”
Section: Experimental Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate more accurately the aerodynamic and sedimentary characteristics of a flat sediment bed, it was necessary to create artificially a rough, granular surface on the leading edge and working sections of the plate. This also provided a fixed surface of uniform geometry over the entire working area upon which loose grains could be placed.. As previous research had demonstrated that, for well sorted sediments, bed permeability has no detectable effect on entrainment dynamics of threshold shear velocity (Williams et al, 1990b), it was concluded that a single layer of grains would provide the necessary consistency of particle packing whilst not adversely affecting threshold determinations. Covering the surface of the plate with fixed grains, however, meant acceptance that boundary layer development would be influenced significantly by roughness elements and that, consequently, its precise properties could not be predicted numerically.…”
Section: Experimental Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early studies identified fundamental relationships and concepts governing sand and dust transport by the airstream which now form the basis for many contemporary investigations into aeolian sediment transport. Technological advances allowing the observation of fine grain transport by the airstream through the use of high technology wind tunnels (Nickling, 1988;Williams et al, 1990), in conjunction with computer simulations of fine grain transport, continue to advance the science. However, research into aeolian grain transport is still largely confined to the semi-arid/arid desert and prairie environments, such as that outlined by Jones et al (1986), Lougeay et al (1987), Brazel and Nickling (1987), Wheaton and Chakravarti (1990), Wheaton (1992) and Lee et al (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that aerodynamic entrainment is primarily a function of the mean grain size of the particles involved combined with the erosivity of the wind, with u * the preferred measure (Williams, Butterfield and Clark, 1990). Bagnold (1941) studied these relationships and derived values of critical threshold shear velocity (u * ct ) for a wide range of particle sizes, using the square root of the grain diameter as the principal determinant: Chepil, 1945).…”
Section: Grain Entrainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%