2010
DOI: 10.2172/1015861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Design Criteria for Class 8 Heavy Vehicles Trailer Base Devices to Attain Optimum Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature there are no certain agreements concerning the optimum length of this device. Cooper [10] observed an optimum length of the device around 0.6m, Croll et al [21] showed a benefit in increasing the length of the device up to 2.4m, while, in Salari [22] measurements, no reasonable improve of drag reduction are observed when the length of the device is increased from 0.8m to 1.2m.…”
Section: Devices Dimension Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In literature there are no certain agreements concerning the optimum length of this device. Cooper [10] observed an optimum length of the device around 0.6m, Croll et al [21] showed a benefit in increasing the length of the device up to 2.4m, while, in Salari [22] measurements, no reasonable improve of drag reduction are observed when the length of the device is increased from 0.8m to 1.2m.…”
Section: Devices Dimension Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 97%